Quantile regression with sample selection: Estimating women's return to education in the U.S

被引:4
作者
Buchinsky M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Brown University, National Bureau of Economic Research, Providence
关键词
Nonparametric selection correction; Quantile regression; Return to education;
D O I
10.1007/s001810000061
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study uses quantile regression techniques to analyze changes in the returns to education for women. The data used is the March Current Population Survey for the years 1968, 1973, 1979, 1986 and 1990. The first step in estimating the single (linear) index selection equation uses Ichimura's (1993) semiparametric procedure. To correct for an unknown form of a sample selection bias in the quantile regression, the second step incorporates a nonparametric method, using an idea similar to one developed by Heckman (1980) and Newey (1991) for mean regression, and Buchinsky (1998) for quantile regression. The results show that: (a) the returns to education increased enormously for the younger cohorts, but very little for the older cohorts; (b) in general the returns are higher at the lower quantiles in the beginning of the sample period and higher at the higher quantiles by the end of the sample period; (c) there is a significant sample selection bias for all age groups at almost all quantiles; (d) toward the end of the sample period there is a significant convergence of the returns at the various quantiles, especially for the younger cohorts and age groups; and (e) the semiparametric estimates of the selection equation are considerably different from those obtained for a parametric probit model.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 113
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Andrews D.W.K., Schafgans M., Semiparametric estimation of a sample selection model, Review of Economic Studies, 65, pp. 497-517, (1998)
[2]  
Blackburn M., Bloom D., Earnings and income inequality in the United States, Population and Development Review, 13, pp. 575-609, (1987)
[3]  
Blackburn M., Bloom D., Freeman R., Changes in earning differentials in the 1980's: Concordance, convergence, causes, and consequences, Poverty and Prosperity in the USA in the Late Twentieth Century, pp. 275-307, (1993)
[4]  
Bound J., Johnson G., Changes in the structure of wages during the 1980's: An evaluation of alternative explanations, American Economic Review, 82, pp. 371-392, (1992)
[5]  
Bound J., Johnson G., Wages in the United States during the 1980's and beyond, Workers and Their Wages, pp. 77-103, (1991)
[6]  
Buchinsky M., The dynamic of changes in the female wage distribution in the USA: A quantile regression approach, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13, pp. 1-30, (1998)
[7]  
Buchinsky M., Quantile regression box-cox transformation model and changes in the returns to schooling and experience, Journal of Econometrics, 65, pp. 109-154, (1995)
[8]  
Buchinsky M., Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963-1987: Application of quantile regression, Econometrica, 62, pp. 405-458, (1994)
[9]  
Card D., Krueger A., Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States, The Journal of Political Economy, 100, pp. 1-40, (1992)
[10]  
Chamberlain G., Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wage, Advances in Econometrics: Sixth World Congress, 1, pp. 171-209, (1994)