How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia

被引:250
作者
Peng M.W. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou J.Q. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Global Strategy, School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson
[2] Ohio State University, Fisher College of Business, Columbus, OH 43210
[3] Department of Global Strategy, University of Texas at Dallas
[4] Global Strategy Interest Group, Strategic Management Society
[5] Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Asia; Evolution; Institutional transitions; Network strategies;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-005-4113-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article contributes to the literature on network strategies and institutional transitions in emerging economies in Asia by identifying a realistic, intermediate phase between the early and late phases of institutional transitions suggested by Peng (2003). Focusing on the intermediate phase, we advance two arguments based on network strength and network content. First, in terms of network strength, we leverage earlier insights that networks can be classified as strong ties and weak ties. Consequently, we suggest that as institutional transitions unfold, strong-tie-based networks, instead of being phased out, are being transformed into weak-ties-based networks. Second, from a network content standpoint, we argue that the various scale and scope of institutional transitions shape the content of different networks which focus on business-to-government (B2G) ties and business-to-business (B2B) relationships. Our propositions delineate how different transitions of political and legal institutions affect the evolution of B2G and B2B networks. Overall, we suggest that networks not only differ in strength but also in content, and that their evolution is driven by the impact of different dimensions of institutional transitions governing B2G and B2B relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 336
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Adler P., Kwan S., Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review, 27, pp. 17-40, (2002)
[2]  
Ahlstrom D., Bruton G., Liu S., Navigating China's changing economy: Strategies for private firms, Business Horizon, pp. 5-15, (2000)
[3]  
Ahlstrom D., Bruton G., Turnaround in Asia: Laying the foundation for understanding this unique domain, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, pp. 5-24, (2004)
[4]  
Amsden A., Kochanowicz J., Taylor L., The Market Meets its Match: Restructuring the Economies of Eastern European, (1995)
[5]  
Audia P., Locke E., Smith K., Paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change, Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp. 837-853, (2000)
[6]  
Biggart N., Delbridge R., Systems of exchange, Academy of Management Review, 29, pp. 23-49, (2004)
[7]  
Boisot M., Child J., From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp. 600-628, (1996)
[8]  
Bruton G., Ahlstrom D., Wan J., Turnaround success of large and midsize Chinese owned firms: Evidence from Hong Kong and Thailand, Journal of World Business, 36, pp. 146-165, (2001)
[9]  
Burt R., Structural Holes, (1992)
[10]  
Burt R., The network structure of social capital, Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, pp. 345-423, (2000)