Brain–computer interfaces and dualism: a problem of brain, mind, and body

被引:10
作者
Lee J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders University, G.P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, 5032, SA
关键词
Brain; Brain–computer interface (BCI); Dualism; Intentions; Interactions; Mind;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-014-0545-8
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The brain–computer interface (BCI) has made remarkable progress in the bridging the divide between the brain and the external environment to assist persons with severe disabilities caused by brain impairments. There is also continuing philosophical interest in BCIs which emerges from thoughtful reflection on computers, machines, and artificial intelligence. This article seeks to apply BCI perspectives to examine, challenge, and work towards a possible resolution to a persistent problem in the mind–body relationship, namely dualism. The original humanitarian goals of BCIs and the technological inventiveness result in BCIs being surprisingly useful. We begin from the neurologically impaired person, the problems encountered, and some pioneering responses from computers and machines. Secondly, the interface of mind and brain is explored via two points of clarification: direct and indirect BCIs, and the nature of thoughts. Thirdly, dualism is beset by mind–body interaction difficulties and is further questioned by the phenomena of intentions, interactions, and technology. Fourthly, animal minds and robots are explored in BCI settings again with relevance for dualism. After a brief look at other BCIs, we conclude by outlining a future BCI philosophy of brain and mind, which might appear ominous and could be possible. © 2014, Springer-Verlag London.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 40
页数:11
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Abramson D., Philosophy of mind is (in part) philosophy of computer science, Minds Mach, 21, pp. 203-219, (2011)
[2]  
Al-Hudhud G., Et al., Using brain signals patterns for biometric identity verification systems, Comput Hum Behav, 31, pp. 224-229, (2014)
[3]  
Allison B.Z., Toward smarter BCIs: extending BCIs through hybridization and intelligent control, J Neural Eng, (2012)
[4]  
Andersen R.A., Et al., Cognitive neural prosthetics, Annu Rev Psychol, 61, pp. 169-190, (2010)
[5]  
Anonymous, My life with Parkinson’s, Nature, 503, pp. 29-30, (2013)
[6]  
Aranyosi I., A new argument for mind–brain identity, Br J Philos Sci, 62, pp. 489-517, (2011)
[7]  
Baldwin D.A., Baird J.A., Discerning intentions in dynamic human action, Trends Cogn Sci, 5, pp. 171-178, (2001)
[8]  
Barrett J.A., A quantum-mechanical argument for mind–body dualism, Erkenntnis, 65, pp. 97-115, (2006)
[9]  
Beauregard M., Mind does really matter: evidence from neuroimaging studies of emotional self-regulation, psychotherapy, and placebo effect, Prog Neurobiol, 81, pp. 218-236, (2007)
[10]  
Bekey G.A., Autonomous robots, from biological inspiration to implementation and control, (2005)