Mechanism-based inactivation of CYP3A by HIV protease inhibitors

被引:201
作者
Ernest, CS [1 ]
Hall, SD [1 ]
Jones, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Div Clin Pharmacol, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1124/jpet.104.075416
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs) are inhibitors of CYP3A enzymes, but the mechanism is poorly defined. In this study, time- and concentration-dependent decreases in activity as defined by maximum rate of inactivation (k(inact)) and inhibitor concentration that gives 50% maximal inactivation (K-I) of CYP3A by amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir were quantified using testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation as a marker for CYP3A activity with recombinant CYP3A4(+b(5)), recombinant CYP3A5, and pooled human liver microsomes (HLMs). All the PIs, except indinavir, displayed inactivation with CYP3A4(+b(5)) and HLMs. Ritonavir was the most potent (K-I = 0.10 and 0.17 muM) and demonstrated high k(inact) values (0.32 and 0.40 min(-1)) with both CYP3A4(+b(5)) and HLMs. Ritonavir was not significantly depleted by high-affinity binding with CYP3A4(+b(5)) and confirmed that estimation of reversible inhibition was confounded with irreversible inhibition. For CYP3A5, nelfinavir exhibited the highest k(inact) (0.47 min(-1)), but ritonavir was the most potent (K-I = 0.12 muM). Saquinavir and indinavir did not show time- and concentration-dependent decreases in activity with CYP3A5. Spectrophototmetrically determined metabolic intermediate complex formation was observed for all of the PIs with CYP3A4(+b(5)), except for lopinavir and saquinavir. The addition of nucleophilic and free aldehyde trapping agents and free iron and reactive oxygen species scavengers did not prevent inactivation of CYP3A4(+b(5)) by ritonavir, amprenavir, or nelfinavir, but glutathione decreased the inactivation by saquinavir (17%) and catalase decreased the inactivation by lopinavir (39%). In conclusion, all the PIs exhibited mechanism-based inactivation, and predictions of the extent and time course of drug interactions with PIs could be underestimated if based solely on reversible inhibition.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 591
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Active apical secretory efflux of the HIV protease inhibitors saquinavir and ritonavir in Caco-2 cell monolayers [J].
Alsenz, J ;
Steffen, H ;
Alex, R .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 15 (03) :423-428
[2]   PARTICULAR ABILITY OF CYTOCHROMES P450 3A TO FORM INHIBITORY P450-IRON-METABOLITE COMPLEXES UPON METABOLIC OXIDATION OF AMINODRUGS [J].
BENSOUSSAN, C ;
DELAFORGE, M ;
MANSUY, D .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 49 (05) :591-602
[3]   Hepatic and intestinal metabolism of indinavir, an HIV protease inhibitor, in rat and human microsomes - Major role of CYP3A [J].
Chiba, M ;
Hensleigh, M ;
Lin, JH .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 53 (08) :1187-1195
[4]  
CORREIA MA, 1991, METHOD ENZYMOL, V206, P315
[5]   Drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and comedicated agents [J].
de Maat, MMR ;
Ekhart, GC ;
Huitema, ADR ;
Koks, CHW ;
Mulder, JW ;
Beijnen, JH .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2003, 42 (03) :223-282
[6]  
Denissen JF, 1997, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V25, P489
[7]   CYP3A4-mediated hepatic metabolism of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor saquinavir in vitro [J].
Eagling, VA ;
Wiltshire, H ;
Whitcombe, IWA ;
Back, DJ .
XENOBIOTICA, 2002, 32 (01) :1-17
[8]   Differential inhibition of cytochrome P450 isoforms by the protease inhibitors, ritonavir, saquinavir and indinavir [J].
Eagling, VA ;
Back, DJ ;
Barry, MG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 44 (02) :190-194
[9]   Pharmacokinetic interactions between protease inhibitors and statins in HIV seronegative volunteers: ACTG Study A5047 [J].
Fichtenbaum, CJ ;
Gerber, JG ;
Rosenkranz, SL ;
Segal, Y ;
Aberg, JA ;
Blaschke, T ;
Alston, B ;
Fang, F ;
Kosel, B ;
Aweeka, F .
AIDS, 2002, 16 (04) :569-577
[10]   Interactions between antiretroviral drugs and drugs used for the therapy of the metabolic complications encountered during HIV infection [J].
Fichtenbaum, CJ ;
Gerber, JG .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2002, 41 (14) :1195-1211