Random yield supply chain with a yield dependent secondary market

被引:78
作者
He, Yuanjie [1 ]
Zhang, Jiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Coll Business Adm, Dept Technol & Operat Management, Pomona, CA 91768 USA
[2] Adelphi Univ, Sch Business, Dept Management Mkt & Decis Sci, Garden City, NY 11530 USA
关键词
Production; Supply chain management; Random yield; Risk sharing; Commitment contract; ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS; PRODUCTION MODELS; UNCERTAIN DEMAND; COMPONENT YIELDS; CONTRACTS; POLICIES; COMMITMENTS; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.021
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper considers a simple supply chain with one supplier and one retailer where the supplier's production is subject to random yield and the retailer faces uncertain demand. There exists a secondary market for acquiring or disposing products by the supplier. We study both the centralized and decentralized systems. In the decentralized system, a no risk sharing contract and a risk sharing minimum commitment contract are analyzed. The supply chain with the risk sharing contract is further analyzed with a constant secondary market price and a yield dependent secondary market price. We present both the supplier's and the retailer's optimal strategies and provide insights for managers when making decisions under random yield risk and demand uncertainty. We find that the secondary market generally has a positive impact on supply chain performance and the actual effect of random yield risk on the supply chain performance depends on cost parameters and supply chain contract settings. Under certain conditions, reducing yield randomness may weaken the double marginalization effect and improve the chain performance. From the numerical study, we also show that there exists an optimal commitment level for the supply chain. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 230
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluating manufacturer's buyback policies in a single-period two-echelon framework under price-dependent stochastic demand [J].
Arcelus, F. J. ;
Kumar, Satyendra ;
Srinivasan, G. .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (05) :808-824
[2]   Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment [J].
Bassok, Y ;
Anupindi, R .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1997, 29 (05) :373-381
[3]  
COHEN EJ, 2006, MANAGE SCI, V52, P54
[4]   Inventory models with random yield in a random environment [J].
Erdem, AS ;
Özekici, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (03) :239-253
[5]   LOT-SIZING IN ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS WITH RANDOM COMPONENT YIELDS [J].
GERCHAK, Y ;
WANG, YZ ;
YANO, CA .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (02) :19-24
[6]   ORDER POINT ORDER QUANTITY MODELS WITH RANDOM YIELD [J].
GERCHAK, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1992, 26 (1-3) :297-298
[7]   PERIODIC REVIEW PRODUCTION MODELS WITH VARIABLE YIELD AND UNCERTAIN DEMAND [J].
GERCHAK, Y ;
VICKSON, RG ;
PARLAR, M .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1988, 20 (02) :144-150
[8]   On sequential commitment in the price-dependent newsvendor model [J].
Granot, Daniel ;
Yin, Shuya .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 177 (02) :939-968
[9]   On coordinating an assembly system under random yield and random demand [J].
Guler, M. Guray ;
Bilgic, Taner .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 196 (01) :342-350
[10]  
Gurnani H, 2000, IIE TRANS, V32, P701, DOI 10.1080/07408170008967428