Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data

被引:80
作者
Chau, W
McIntosh, AR
Robinson, SE
Schulz, M
Pantev, C
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Re sInst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Munster Univ Hosp, Inst Biomagnetism & Biosignalanal, Munster, Germany
[3] CTF Syst Inc, Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
magnetoencephalography; permutation test;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Non-parametric statistical methods, such as permutation, are flexible tools to analyze data when the population distribution is not known. With minimal assumptions and better statistical power compared to the parametric tests, permutation tests have recently been applied to the spatially filtered magnetoencephalography (MEG) data for group analysis. To perform permutation tests on neuroimaging data, an empirical maximal null distribution has to be found, which is free from any activated voxels, to determine the threshold to classify the voxels as active at a given probability level. An iterative procedure is used to determine the distribution by computing the null distribution, which is recomputed when a possible activated voxel is found within the current distributions. Besides the high computational costs associated with this approach, there is no guarantee that all activated voxels are excluded when constructing the maximal null distribution, which may reduce the statistical power. In this study, we propose a novel way to construct the maximal null distribution from the data of the resting period. The approach is tested on the MEG data from a somatosensory experiment, and demonstrated that the approach could improve the power of the permutation test while reducing the computational cost at the same time. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 996
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Randomization tests
[2]   Tests for comparing images based on randomization and permutation methods [J].
Arndt, S ;
Cizadlo, T ;
Andreasen, NC ;
Heckel, D ;
Gold, S ;
OLeary, DS .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1996, 16 (06) :1271-1279
[3]   Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images [J].
Barnes, GR ;
Hillebrand, A .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2003, 18 (01) :1-12
[4]   Permutation testing made practical for functional magnetic resonance image analysis [J].
Belmonte, M ;
Yurgelun-Todd, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (03) :243-248
[5]   Functional organization of primary somatosensory cortex depends on the focus of attention [J].
Braun, C ;
Haug, M ;
Wiech, K ;
Birbaumer, N ;
Elbert, T ;
Roberts, LE .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (03) :1451-1458
[6]   Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Suckling, J ;
Overmeyer, S ;
Rabe-Hesketh, S ;
Taylor, E ;
Brammer, MJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (01) :32-42
[7]  
CHAU W, 2002, 13 INT C BIOM
[8]   A multivariate, spatiotemporal analysis of electromagnetic time-frequency data of recognition memory [J].
Düzel, E ;
Habib, R ;
Schott, B ;
Schoenfeld, A ;
Lobaugh, N ;
McIntosh, AR ;
Scholz, M ;
Heinze, HJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 18 (02) :185-197
[9]   Neuroimaging evidence for cortical involvement in the preparation and in the act of swallowing [J].
Dziewas, R ;
Sörös, P ;
Ishii, R ;
Chau, W ;
Henningsen, H ;
Ringelstein, EB ;
Knecht, S ;
Pantev, C .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (01) :135-144
[10]   Spatial registration and normalization of images [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Ashburner, J ;
Frith, CD ;
Poline, JB ;
Heather, JD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (03) :165-189