Open versus closed firms and the dynamics of industry evolution

被引:17
作者
Arora, Ashish [1 ]
Bokhari, Farasat A. S.
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, H John Heinz III Sch Publ Policy & Management, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Dept Econ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00321.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We develop a model of industry evolution in which firms choose proprietary standards (closed firm) or adopt a common standard (open firm). A closed entrant can capture multiple profits whereas an open entrant faces lower entry barriers: The odds of closed entry (relative to open entry) decrease with price and eventually open entry becomes more likely. While initially closed firms have better survival because they can offset losses in one component with profits from another, the situation is reversed when prices fall below a threshold. These entry and exit dynamics can lead the industry away from its long run equilibrium.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 527
页数:29
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   COMMODITY BUNDLING AND BURDEN OF MONOPOLY [J].
ADAMS, WJ ;
YELLEN, JL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1976, 90 (03) :475-498
[2]  
Denicolò V, 2000, J IND ECON, V48, P177
[3]  
ECONOMIDES N, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P1165
[4]  
Farrell J, 1998, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V7, P143, DOI 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1998.00143.x
[5]   STANDARDIZATION AND VARIETY [J].
FARRELL, J ;
SALONER, G .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1986, 20 (01) :71-74
[6]   STANDARDIZATION, COMPATIBILITY, AND INNOVATION [J].
FARRELL, J ;
SALONER, G .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1985, 16 (01) :70-83
[7]  
JOVANOVIC B, 1982, ECONOMETRICA, V50, P3
[8]  
Klepper S, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P562
[9]  
LAFONT J, 1988, ECNOMETRICA, V59, P1735
[10]   EXTERNAL ECONOMIES AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS - THE CASE OF THE MICROCOMPUTER INDUSTRY [J].
LANGLOIS, RN .
BUSINESS HISTORY REVIEW, 1992, 66 (01) :1-50