Patent validation at the country level-The role of fees and translation costs

被引:56
作者
Harhoff, Dietmar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hoisl, Karin [1 ]
Reichl, Bettina [4 ]
de la Potterie, Bruno van Pottelsberghe [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Innovat Res Technol Management & Entrepreneu, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[2] CEPR, London, England
[3] ZEW, Mannheim, Germany
[4] EPO, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Libre Bruxelles, SBS EM, ECARES, CEB, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Libre Bruxelles, DULBEA, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Bruegel, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Patent fees; Validation fees; Renewal fees; Gravity model; GRAVITY MODEL; TRADE; MIGRATION; INSIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.014
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
One feature of the European patent system that is heavily criticized nowadays is related to its fragmentation and the induced cost burden for applicants. Once a patent is granted by the EPO, the assignee must validate (and often translate) it and pay the renewal fees to keep it in force in each country in which protection is sought. The objective of this paper is to assess to what extent validation and renewal fees as well as translation costs affect the validation behavior of applicants. We rely on a gravity model that aims at explaining patent flows between inventor and target countries within the European patent system. The results show that the size of countries, their wealth and the distance between their capital cities are significant determinants of patent flows. Validation fees and renewal fees further affect the validation behavior of applicants. Translation costs seem to have an impact as well. The implementation of cost-reducing policy interventions like the London Protocol will, therefore, induce a significant increase in the number of patents validated in each European country. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1437
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Abrams R.K., 1980, ECON REV, V65, P3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, US PAT DAT SCI TECHN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PROTECTING THEIR INT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Economics of the European Patent System. IP Policy for Innovation and Competition. Dominique GUELLEC e Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la POTTERIE (org.), P155
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1962, Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economics policy
[6]   When small is beautiful: Measuring the evolution and consequences of the voluminosity of patent applications at the EPO [J].
Archontopoulos, Eugenio ;
Guellec, Dominique ;
Stevnsborg, Niels ;
de la Potterie, Bruno van Pottelsberghe ;
van Zeebroeck, Nicolas .
INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2007, 19 (02) :103-132
[7]   The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation [J].
Arundel, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (04) :611-624
[9]  
BERGSTRAND JH, 1984, GRAVITY EQUATION FAC
[10]   Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany [J].
Blind, K ;
Edler, J ;
Frietsch, R ;
Schmoch, U .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (05) :655-672