Unpacking the Dynamics of Ecologies of Routines: Mediators and Their Generative Effects in Routine Interactions

被引:54
作者
Sele, Kathrin [1 ]
Grand, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse 1, CNRS, UMR 5303, IAE Toulouse Sch Management,Ctr Res Management, F-31000 Toulouse, France
[2] Univ St Gallen, RISE Management Innovat Lab, Inst Syst Management & Publ Governance, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
ecologies of routines; routine interactions; generativity; actants; mediators and intermediaries; actor-network theory (ANT); translation; ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES; CAPABILITIES; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; FLEXIBILITY; ARTIFACTS;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2015.1031
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Building on an in-depth ethnographic study at a renowned research laboratory, we show how the interactions of organizational routines can be more or less generative by tracing and analyzing how human and nonhuman actors (actants) connect routines. Adopting a performative perspective, we compare the connecting of such actants and study how they are engaged in routine performances. We relate observed differences in the generativity of routine interactions to whether actants become mediators or intermediaries. Whereas intermediaries merely maintain connections between routines, mediators can modify them when performing routine connections. We identify three generative effects mediators can lead to: (1) the creation of innovative outcomes, (2) the adaptation of existing routine performances, and/or (3) the emergence of new routine performances. Similar to the conception of organizational routines as dynamic and generative systems, we show that the way actants operate through their engagement renders routine interactions and thus ecologies of routines more or less generative.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 738
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]  
AI Lab, 2007, RED INT 20 YEARS AI
[3]  
Akrich Madeleine., 2002, International Journal of Innovation Management, V6, P187, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919602000550, DOI 10.1142/S1363919602000550]
[4]   THE MINDLESSNESS OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIORS [J].
ASHFORTH, BE ;
FRIED, Y .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1988, 41 (04) :305-329
[5]   Organizational routines: a review of the literature [J].
Becker, MC .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2004, 13 (04) :643-677
[6]  
Becker MC, 2009, ORG ROUTINES ADV EMP, P303
[7]  
Bijker W. E., 1997, Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change
[8]   Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove [J].
Birnholtz, Jeremy P. ;
Cohen, Michael D. ;
Hoch, Susannah V. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (02) :315-332
[9]  
Callon Michel., 1986, Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1467-954X.1984.TB00113.X, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x]
[10]  
Cyert R.M., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm