Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the North-South divide

This article demonstrates empirically that widespread convergence in the degree of industrialization between former First and Third World countries over the past four decades has not been associated with convergence in the levels of income enjoyed on average by the residents of these two groups of countries. Our findings contradict the widely made claim that the significance of the North-South divide is diminishing. This contention is based on a false identification of "industrialization" with "development" and "industrialized" with "wealthy." Elaborating from elements of Joseph Schumpeter's theory of innovation, Raymond Vernon's product cycle model, and Pierre Bourdieu's concept of illusio, the article offers an explanation for the persistence of the North-South income divide, despite rapid Third World industrialization and despite dramatic changes in the world political-ideological context for development (that is, the shift around 1980 from the "development" project to the "globalization" project or "Washington Consensus"). While emphasizing the long-term stability of the Northem-dominated hierarchy of wealth, the article concludes by pointing to several contemporary processes that may destabilize not only the "globalization project," but also the global hierarchy of wealth that has characterized historical capitalism.