Advertising competition under consumer inertia

被引:53
作者
Banerjee, B [1 ]
Bandyopadhyay, S
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Walker Coll Business, Dept Mkt, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[2] Indian Inst Management, Ahmedabad 380015, Gujarat, India
[3] Indiana Univ NW, Sch Business & Econ, Gary, IN 46408 USA
关键词
consumer inertia; duopoly; advertising competition; game theory;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.22.1.131.12843
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We construct a multistage game-theoretic model of advertising and price competition in a differentiated products duopoly, in which proportions of consumers exhibit latent inertia in favor of repeat purchase. Advertising simultaneously plays the dual role in reducing such inertia through awareness and enhancing perceived brand value (persuasion). We derive the advertising price cross-effects and provide a theoretical reconciliation of the longstanding debate in the marketing literature regarding the impact of advertising on price sensitivity. We characterize the nature of equilibria under symmetry and show that when a large proportion of consumers exhibit inertial tendencies, then a multiplicity of equilibria exists. Marketing implications and comparative statics are discussed. Numerical simulations for asymmetric firms are presented, wherein we show that advertising is not a useful competitive tool for small firms. However, advertising spending by the large firm provides a halo effect for the average prices in the category, which has a positive externality on the small firm's profits. In the absence of the small brand advertising, larger brand shares encourage firms to allocate higher expenditures on advertising to enhance the perceived value of their brand, which in turn shore up the average prices in the industry from which all firms benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 144
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   MEASURING THE SHORT-TERM EFFECT OF IN-STORE PROMOTION AND RETAIL ADVERTISING ON BRAND SALES - A FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT [J].
BEMMAOR, AC ;
MOUCHOUX, D .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1991, 28 (02) :202-214
[2]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND PROMOTIONAL PRICE ELASTICITIES [J].
BOLTON, RN .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (02) :153-169
[3]   MASTERING THE MIX - DO ADVERTISING, PROMOTION, AND SALES FORCE ACTIVITIES LEAD TO DIFFERENTIATION [J].
BOULDING, W ;
LEE, EY ;
STAELIN, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (02) :159-172
[4]   EQUILIBRIUM DISTRIBUTIONS OF SALES AND ADVERTISING PRICES [J].
BUTTERS, GR .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1977, 44 (03) :465-491
[5]  
Comanor WilliamS., 1974, Advertising and Market Power
[6]  
GHOSH A, 1983, 1983 ED C P CHIC, P226
[7]  
GROSSMAN GM, 1984, REV ECON STUD, V51, P63, DOI 10.2307/2297705
[8]   AN EVALUATION COST MODEL OF CONSIDERATION SETS [J].
HAUSER, JR ;
WERNERFELT, B .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1990, 16 (04) :393-408
[9]   THE COMPETITIVE IMPLICATIONS OF RELEVANT-SET RESPONSE ANALYSIS [J].
HAUSER, JR ;
WERNERFELT, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (04) :391-405
[10]   PRICE SENSITIVITY AND TELEVISION ADVERTISING EXPOSURES - SOME EMPIRICAL-FINDINGS [J].
KANETKAR, V ;
WEINBERG, CB ;
WEISS, DL .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1992, 11 (04) :359-371