Why Do Policymakers Support Administrative Burdens? The Roles of Deservingness, Political Ideology, and Personal Experience

被引:105
作者
Baekgaard, Martin [1 ]
Moynihan, Donald P. [2 ]
Thomsen, Mette Kjaergaard [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
WELFARE; STATE; REPRESENTATION; SELECTION; COSTS;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/muaa033
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Administrative burdens affect peoples' experience of public administration but there is, to date, limited evidence to as why policymakers are willing to accept and impose burdens.To address this gap, we draw from the policy design and administrative burden literatures to develop the concept of burden tolerance-the willingness of policymakers and people more generally to passively allow or actively impose state actions that result in others experiencing administrative burdens. Drawing on a survey experiment and observational data with Danish local politicians in a social welfare setting, we find that more right-wing politicians are more tolerant of burdens, but politicians are less willing to impose burdens on a welfare claimant perceived as being more deserving. Politicians with a personal experience of receiving welfare benefits themselves are less tolerant of burdens, while information about the psychological costs experienced by claimants did not reduce burden tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 200
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Welfare reform in the United States: gender, race and class matter [J].
Abramovitz, Mimi .
CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2006, 26 (02) :336-364
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Piven Cloward, pxiii
[3]   Negative feedback, political attention, and public policy [J].
Baekgaard, Martin ;
Larsen, Soren K. ;
Mortensen, Peter B. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 97 (01) :210-225
[4]   The Bureaucracy and the Policy Agenda [J].
Baekgaard, Martin ;
Mortensen, Peter B. ;
Seeberg, Henrik Bech .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2018, 28 (02) :239-253
[5]   Self-selection or Socialization? A Dynamic Analysis of Committee Member Preferences [J].
Baekgaard, Martin .
LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2010, 35 (03) :337-359
[6]   Jim Crow 2.0? Why States Consider and Adopt Restrictive Voter Access Policies [J].
Bentele, Keith G. ;
O'Brien, Erin E. .
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2013, 11 (04) :1088-1116
[7]  
Bisgaard Mette, 2018, EGPA C LAUSNN 5 7 SE
[8]  
Blom-Hansen J., 2011, OXFORD HDB LOCAL REG
[9]   Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming [J].
Brodkin, Evelyn Z. ;
Majmundar, Malay .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2010, 20 (04) :827-848
[10]   Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class and Representation: Evidence from Latin America [J].
Carnes, Nicholas ;
Lupu, Noam .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (01) :1-18