The Tromso Study: Determinants of precision in bone densitometry

被引:33
作者
Berntsen, GKR [1 ]
Fonnebo, V
Tollan, A
Sogaard, AJ
Joakimsen, RM
Magnus, JH
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Inst Community Med, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[2] Cent Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, N-2300 Hamar, Norway
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth, N-0403 Oslo, Norway
关键词
bone mineral density; precision; SXA; forearm; age; repositioning;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00234-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Studies of precision determinants in bone densitometry are scarce. A total of 111 subjects recruited from the population-based multipurpose Tromso Study (Norway), 27-75 years of age, had repeated forearm bone single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) measurements. Measurement conditions were systematically varied in series up to eight scans. Median coefficients of variation (CV) for two scans performed 1 week apart, by two different operators were 0.79% and 0.98% at distal and ultradistal sites, respectively. The CV distribution was skewed: 5% of the subjects had individual CVs above 2.2% (distal) and 3.4% (ultradistal). Age (P = 0.0097) and repositioning were important determinants of precision. The SXA bone mineral density (BMD)-measurement method is sufficiently precise to establish BMD level. The minimal individual percentage BMD change that can be detected with 95% certainty was 2% and 3% at distal and ultradistal sites, respectively. Detection of BMD changes less than this should rely on multiple repeat measurements at each point in time. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1112
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Altman D. G., 1991, Practical statistics for medical research, P179
[2]  
ALTMAN DG, 1994, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P169
[3]   The Tromso study: Artifacts in forearm bone densitometry prevalence and effects [J].
Berntsen, GKR ;
Tollan, A ;
Magnus, JH ;
Sogaard, AJ ;
Ringberg, T ;
Fonnebo, V .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 10 (05) :425-432
[4]   INTERSITE COMPARISON OF THE HOLOGIC QDR-1000 DUAL ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
TONG, CM ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (761) :440-446
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   SINGLE X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY - PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPARISON WITH SINGLE-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
BORG, J ;
MOLLGAARD, A ;
RIIS, BJ .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (05) :377-381
[7]  
EL-HAJJ FULEIHAN G, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, P1004
[8]   QUALITY-CONTROL OF DXA INSTRUMENTS IN MULTICENTER TRIALS [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
MCCLUNG, MR .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :218-227
[9]   THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF BONE LOSS FOR FRAGILITY FRACTURES IN WOMEN - A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OVER 15 YEARS [J].
GARDSELL, P ;
JOHNELL, O ;
NILSSON, BE .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 49 (02) :90-94
[10]   QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR BONE DENSITOMETRY RESEARCH STUDIES - CONCEPT AND IMPACT [J].
GLUER, CC ;
FAULKNER, KG ;
ESTILO, MJ ;
ENGELKE, K ;
ROSIN, J ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 3 (05) :227-235