The Effect of Experience on Context-dependent Decisions

被引:15
作者
Ert, Eyal [1 ]
Lejarraga, Tomas [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Environm Econ & Management, POB 12, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[2] Univ Illes Balears, Dept Econ Empresa, Ctra Valldemossa Km 7-5, Palma De Mallorca 07122, Spain
[3] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Adapt Rat, Berlin, Germany
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
decoy effect; attraction effect; context-dependent choice; asymmetric dominance; decisions from experience; description-experience gap; PROSPECT-THEORY; LOSS AVERSION; CHOICE; RISK; PROBABILITY; AMBIGUITY; ALTERNATIVES; PREFERENCES; VIOLATIONS; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.2064
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Does the well-documented decoy effect emerge in decisions from experience among risky options? We conducted a series of experiments where participants made choices between gambles, and we varied whether participants learned about the options from description, experience, or both. Our results consistently showed no traces of the decoy effect when participants learned from experience. Even when participants read precise descriptions of the options, actually experiencing those options eliminated the decoy effect. Moreover, in decisions under risk (decisions from description), the decoy effect is less robust than previously thought. The decoy effect only emerged in an experimental design in which we used two decoys generating attraction for different options but did not emerge when only one decoy was used. Increasing the distance between the decoy and the target did not make the decoy effect emerge in decisions from experience but seemed to reduce the decoy effect in decisions from description. Overall, we identify two boundary conditions for the decoy effect in decisions under risk: First, it is not robust to situations that involve learning from experience; and second, the attraction of a single decoy may not be sufficient to observe a decoy effect. Copyright (c) 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 546
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, WILEY BLACKWELL HDB, DOI 10.1002/
[2]   Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds [J].
Bateson, M ;
Healy, SD ;
Hurly, TA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1521) :1271-1276
[3]   Learning, risk attitude and hot stoves in restless bandit problems [J].
Biele, Guido ;
Erev, Ido ;
Ert, Eyal .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 53 (03) :155-167
[4]  
Doyle JR, 1999, PSYCHOL MARKET, V16, P225, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199905)16:3<225::AID-MAR3>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-O
[6]   The Description-Experience Gap in Risky and Ambiguous Gambles [J].
Dutt, Varun ;
Arlo-Costa, Horacio ;
Helzner, Jeffrey ;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 27 (04) :316-327
[7]  
Edwards Ward., 1968, Formal representation of human judgment, V17, P51
[8]   From Anomalies to Forecasts: Toward a Descriptive Model of Decisions Under Risk, Under Ambiguity, and From Experience [J].
Erev, Ido ;
Ert, Eyal ;
Plonsky, Ori ;
Cohen, Doron ;
Cohen, Oded .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2017, 124 (04) :369-409
[9]   Loss Aversion, Diminishing Sensitivity, and the Effect of Experience on Repeated Decisions [J].
Erev, Ido ;
Ert, Eyal ;
Yechiam, Eldad .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 21 (05) :575-597
[10]   Revisiting risk aversion: Can risk preferences change with experience? [J].
Ert, Eyal ;
Haruvy, Ernan .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 151 :91-95