Guidelines for the use of do-not-resuscitate orders in Dutch hospitals

被引:12
作者
Haverkate, I [1 ]
van Delden, JJM
van Nijen, AB
van der Wal, G
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Res Extramural Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gen Practice Nursing Home Med & Social Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Bioeth & Hlth Law, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Rosendael Nursing Home, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
guidelines; hospitals; do-not-resuscitate decisions; directors of patient care;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-200008000-00060
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the prevalence and analyze the content of guidelines for the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in Dutch hospitals. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Measurements and Main Results: A questionnaire was mailed to the directors of patient care at all 143 Dutch hospitals. Directors were asked whether their hospitals had guidelines for the use of DNR orders and to provide copies of the guidelines if they did. The content of the guidelines was analyzed with regard to basic assumptions about nonresuscitation, definitions, persons involved in decision-making, advance directives, starting discussions about nonresuscitation, notation, evaluation, and other aspects. Of the 143 hospital directors surveyed, 95% responded. Sixty percent of the hospitals had guidelines for the use of DNR orders and provided copies. The assumption "always resuscitate, unless" was mentioned in 66% of guidelines, In 93% it was stated that patients should be involved in decision-making about non-futile resuscitation. In 38% it was stated that in principle, living wills were respected in cases of incompetence. The role of proxies was mainly to discuss decisions (58% of guidelines), not to make them. The most frequently mentioned moment for starting a discussion about nonresuscitation was the onset of clinical deterioration of the patient (41%). Conclusions: It is promising that 60% of Dutch hospitals have developed guidelines for the use of DNR orders, However, current guidelines can be improved in many respects.
引用
收藏
页码:3039 / 3043
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1976, N ENGL J MED, V295, P362
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Journal of the American Medical Association, DOI [10. 1001/jama. 1992. 03490160041023, DOI 10.1001/JAMA.1992.03490160041023]
[3]  
[Anonymous], GUID TERM LIF SUST T
[4]  
BLIJHAM GH, 1996, MED CONTACT, V51, P1066
[5]   CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES - A STATEWIDE NURSING-HOME STUDY [J].
BRUNETTI, LL ;
WEISS, MJ ;
STUDENSKI, SA ;
CLIPP, EC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 150 (01) :121-126
[6]   LONG-TERM-CARE FACILITY POLICIES ON LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS AND ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN CANADA [J].
CHOUDHRY, NK ;
MA, J ;
RASOOLY, I ;
SINGER, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1994, 42 (11) :1150-1153
[7]   WITHHOLDING CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION - PROPOSALS FOR FORMAL GUIDELINES [J].
DOYAL, L ;
WILSHER, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6892) :1593-1596
[8]  
*DUTCH ORG QUAL AS, 1991, POL DO NOT RES GUID
[9]   THE DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDER - STILL TOO LITTLE TOO LATE [J].
GLEESON, K ;
WISE, S .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 150 (05) :1057-1060
[10]   Policies on medical decisions concerning the end of life in Dutch health care institutions [J].
Haverkate, I ;
vanderWal, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (06) :435-439