IQ and Mutual Fund Choice

被引:40
作者
Grinblatt, Mark [1 ]
Ikaheimo, Seppo [2 ]
Keloharju, Matti [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Knupfer, Samuli [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, UCLA Anderson Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Business, Aalto 000076, Finland
[3] Res Inst Ind Econ, SE-10215 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London EC1V 3PZ, England
[5] BI Norwegian Business Sch, N-0484 Oslo, Norway
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
mutual fund; IQ; education; fees; portfolio choice; PERFORMANCE; PRICE; IMPACT; OBFUSCATION;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2015.2166
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We show that cognitive ability influences mutual fund choice: high-IQ investors avoid funds with high management fees. Two competing stories can explain this phenomenon. One is that high-IQ consumers benefit less from costly services, as they find it easier to make informed financial decisions without external help. The alternative story is that these investors are less likely to overpay for the services they receive because they are either better judges of value or more capable of discerning the price charged for these services. A comprehensive data set of Finnish males' fund holdings supports both stories: consistent with the first story, high-IQ investors tend to avoid funds sold via expensive service-intensive channels and prefer a mix of equity and bond funds to expensive readily packaged balanced funds. Consistent with the alternative story, IQ and fees are inversely correlated, even after controlling for many fund services, including any operating at the fund family level.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 944
页数:21
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Cognitive Abilities and Household Financial Decision Making [J].
Agarwal, Sumit ;
Mazumder, Bhashkar .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 5 (01) :193-207
[2]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[3]   The Impact of Shrouded Fees: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in the Indian Mutual Funds Market [J].
Anagol, Santosh ;
Kim, Hugh Hoikwang .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :576-593
[4]  
[Anonymous], MANAGERIAL DECISION
[5]   Behavioral biases of mutual fund investors [J].
Bailey, Warren ;
Kumar, Alok ;
Ng, David .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 102 (01) :1-27
[6]   Out of sight, out of mind: The effects of expenses on mutual fund flows [J].
Barber, BM ;
Odean, T ;
Zheng, L .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2005, 78 (06) :2095-2119
[7]   Mutual fund flows and performance in rational markets [J].
Berk, JB ;
Green, RC .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 112 (06) :1269-1295
[8]   Operating costs of pension funds: the impact of scale, governance, and plan design [J].
Bikker, Jacob A. ;
De Dreu, Jan .
JOURNAL OF PENSION ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2009, 8 (01) :63-89
[9]   THE PERFORMANCE OF BOND MUTUAL FUNDS [J].
BLAKE, CR ;
ELTON, EJ ;
GRUBER, MJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1993, 66 (03) :371-403
[10]   Robust Inference With Multiway Clustering [J].
Cameron, A. Colin ;
Gelbach, Jonah B. ;
Miller, Douglas L. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2011, 29 (02) :238-249