Adaptation and pathways of change and response: A case study from Eastern Europe

被引:38
作者
Campeanu, Claudia N. [1 ]
Fazey, Ioan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Sch Sociol & Social Work, Bucharest 010181, Romania
[2] Univ Dundee, Sch Environm, CECHR, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2014年 / 28卷
关键词
Adaptation pathways; Assets; Ethnicity; Romania; Subsistence farming; Vulnerability; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; LIVELIHOODS APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; VULNERABILITY; RESILIENCE; POLICY; TRANSFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There are increasing calls for conceptualizing adaptation as future pathways as a foresight tool for adaptation planning and implementation. To assist understanding of future adaptation pathways, this paper used ethnographic approaches to understand past pathways of response to major social and political change over the last seven decades in a rural Transylvanian community. The results identified five main socio-ethnic groups that had different pathways of response to key periods of change. These periods provided different constraints and opportunities, and shaped the accumulation and loss of different categories of assets for each socio-ethnic group. Findings show that adaptation is an ongoing process in which responses and decisions are patterned along multiple, socially contingent trajectories with continuities and legacies. Importantly, while the different groups had interrelated pathways, these were associated with a powerful normative pathway that was implicated in producing and reinforcing local social hierarchies. In this case, the normative pathway was a mix of practicing subsistence agriculture and small scale flexible income generation. The nuanced understanding of the change and response dynamics in the village provide important insights for anticipating responses to, and the impacts of, future change. It also highlights the need for holistic and multi-perspective approaches when developing and implementing adaptation pathways. These approaches should responsibly and carefully consider the implications of particular future paths for all concerned, but especially for those that are the most marginalized in society. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 367
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[2]  
Akeroyd J, 2006, Nature Conservation. Environmental Science and Engineering (Environmental Science), P199, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2_21, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2_21]
[3]  
Allison HE, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
[4]  
Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
[5]   Loss of resilience, crisis, and institutional change: Lessons from an intensive agricultural system in southeastern Australia [J].
Anderies, John M. ;
Ryan, Paul ;
Walker, Brian H. .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2006, 9 (06) :865-878
[6]  
[Anonymous], I VOISINAGE TRANSYLV
[7]  
[Anonymous], DIASPORAS MONDE CONT
[8]  
[Anonymous], HDB METHODS CULTURAL
[9]  
[Anonymous], REFORMA AGRARA 1945
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SEMISUBSISTENCE FARM