Futures trading, spot market volatility, and market efficiency: The case of the Korean index futures markets

被引:48
作者
Bae, SC [1 ]
Kwon, TH
Park, JW
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Finance, Coll Business Adm, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
[2] Yosu Natl Univ, Dept Int Commerce, Yosu, South Korea
[3] Jeju Natl Univ, Dept Business Adm, Cheju, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1002/fut.20135
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effect of the introduction of index futures trading in the Korean markets on spot price volatility and market efficiency of the underlying KOSPI 200 stocks, relative to the carefully matched non-KOSPI 200 stocks. Employing both an event study approach and a matching-sample approach for the market data during the period of January 1990-December 1998, we find that the introduction of KOSPI 200 index futures trading is associated with greater market efficiency but, at the same time, greater spot price volatility in the underlying stock market. We also find that KOSPI 200 stocks experience lower spot price volatility and higher trading efficiency than non-KOSPI 200 stocks after the introduction of futures trading. The trading efficiency gap between the two groups of stocks, however, declines over time and vanishes following the addition of options trading. Overall, our results suggest that while futures trading in Korea increases spot price volatility and market efficiency, there exists volatility spillover to stocks against which futures are not traded. We provide several factors unique in the Korean markets including circuit breakers, sidercar system, restrictions on foreign ownership, and inactive program trading as potential factors to explain some of our puzzling evidence. We further consider the potential effect of changes in daily price limits utilized by the Korea Stock Exchange during the testing period on our empirical findings. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1195 / 1228
页数:34
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J BUS FINAN ACCOUNT, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5957.1996.TB01134.X
[2]   FUTURES TRADING, INFORMATION AND SPOT PRICE VOLATILITY - EVIDENCE FOR THE FTSE-100 STOCK INDEX FUTURES CONTRACT USING GARCH [J].
ANTONIOU, A ;
HOLMES, P .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1995, 19 (01) :117-129
[3]   NONSYNCHRONOUS SECURITY TRADING AND MARKET INDEX AUTOCORRELATION [J].
ATCHISON, MD ;
BUTLER, KC ;
SIMONDS, RR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1987, 42 (01) :111-118
[4]  
Bae S.C., 1999, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, V13, P153, DOI [10.1023/A:1008395810033, DOI 10.1023/A:1008395810033]
[5]   FIRM VALUATION, EARNINGS EXPECTATIONS, AND THE EXCHANGE-RATE EXPOSURE EFFECT [J].
BARTOV, E ;
BODNAR, GM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1994, 49 (05) :1755-1785
[6]  
BECHETTI S, 1990, FEDERAL RESERVE NOV, P33
[7]   FUTURES-TRADING ACTIVITY AND STOCK-PRICE VOLATILITY [J].
BESSEMBINDER, H ;
SEGUIN, PJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1992, 47 (05) :2015-2034
[8]  
Board John, 2001, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, V28, P799
[9]  
BOX GEP, 1994, TIME SERIES ANL
[10]   FUTURES TRADING, TRANSACTION COSTS, AND STOCK-MARKET VOLATILITY [J].
BRORSEN, BW .
JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 1991, 11 (02) :153-163