Surgical modifications of radical retropubic prostatectomy to decrease incidence of positive surgical margins

被引:61
作者
Alsikafi, NF [1 ]
Brendler, CB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63581-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We sought to determine whether recent surgical modifications in the technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy decrease the incidence of positive surgical margins. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 144 consecutive patients a mean of 60.8 years old who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy using a modified surgical technique. Mean prostate specific antigen was 8.6 ng./ml. and mean Gleason grade was 5.8. Surgical modifications included division of the dorsal venous complex of the penis 10 to 15 mm. distal to the prostatic apex; transection of the urethra 3 mm. beyond the prostatic apex; division of the anterior aspect of the urethra, leaving the investing periurethral musculature intact, and division of the posterior aspect of the urethra en bloc with the striated urethral sphinter; sharp dissection of the rectourethralis muscle and remaining attachments of the prostate to the rectum; wide excision of the neurovascular bundle posterolateral to the prostate when adjacent induration or tumor is present, and division of the bladder neck, leaving a 5 mm. cuff of bladder tissue with the prostate. Results: Of 144 consecutive patients 16 (11.1%) had positive surgical margins at a total of 20 sites, including 7 (35%) at the apex, 8 (40%) posterolateral, 3 (15%) anterior and 2 (10%) at the bladder neck. These results compare favorably with the positive surgical margin rates after radical prostatectomy previously reported in the literature. Conclusions: These surgical modifications appear to have decreased the incidence of positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1285
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF RISK-FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE-CANCER EXTENSION TO THE SURGICAL MARGIN AND PELVIC NODE METASTASIS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
ACKERMAN, DA ;
BARRY, JM ;
WICKLUND, RA ;
OLSON, N ;
LOWE, BA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (06) :1845-1850
[2]   A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT PREDICT FOR PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FAILURE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
DAMICO, AV ;
WHITTINGTON, R ;
MALKOWICZ, SB ;
SCHULTZ, D ;
SCHNALL, M ;
TOMASZEWSKI, JE ;
WEIN, A .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) :131-138
[3]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[4]  
EPSTEIN JI, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V71, P3582, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930601)71:11<3582::AID-CNCR2820711120>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-Y
[6]   Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy - A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Partin, AW ;
Sauvageot, J ;
Walsh, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1996, 20 (03) :286-292
[7]   Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostatic carcinoma with digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen and the results of 6 systematic biopsies [J].
Huland, H ;
Hammerer, P ;
Henke, RP ;
Huland, E .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (04) :1344-1347
[8]   RESECTION MARGIN STATUS IN RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS - RELATIONSHIP TO TYPE OF OPERATION, TUMOR SIZE, TUMOR GRADE AND LOCAL TUMOR EXTENSION [J].
JONES, EC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (01) :89-93
[9]  
LEPOR H, 1985, J UROLOGY, V133, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)48885-9
[10]   IMPACT OF BLADDER NECK PRESERVATION DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON CONTINENCE AND CANCER CONTROL [J].
LICHT, MR ;
KLEIN, EA ;
TUASON, L ;
LEVIN, H .
UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (06) :883-887