Do high technology acquirers become more innovative?

被引:141
作者
Desyllas, Panos [1 ]
Hughes, Alan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Ctr Business Res, Cambridge CB2 1AG, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Acquisitions; Innovation; Propensity score; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; DOMINANT LOGIC; UNITED-STATES; SHORT-TERMISM; PERFORMANCE; MERGERS; FIRMS; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Drawing on organizational, managerial and financial theories, we explore whether acquirers become more innovative and the factors that can enhance their absorptive and financial capacity to benefit from acquisition. Over a 3-year post-acquisition window, our sample of 2624 high technology US acquisitions records early reverses followed by positive R&D-intensity changes and insignificant R&D productivity changes. Controlling for acquisition endogeneity and deal-specific effects, significant acquirer characteristic effects emerge. In related acquisitions, a large knowledge base tends to increase R&D productivity, consistent with an enhanced capacity to select and absorb targets. In unrelated acquisitions, however, this relationship becomes increasingly negative as knowledge base concentration increases, consistent with arguments for an impaired peripheral vision and core rigidities. High leverage levels raise R&D productivity gains, consistent with enhanced monitoring induced efficiency. However, high leverage growth reduces R&D-intensity, consistent with increased financial constraints and short-termism. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1121
页数:17
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) :197-220
[2]  
Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10438590210899, 10.1080/10438590210899]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GUIDE ECONOMETRICS
[5]  
Ashby W.R., 1956, An introduction to cybernetics
[6]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[7]  
Baumol W.J., 1988, Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure
[8]  
BETTIS RA, 1995, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V16, P5, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250160104
[9]  
BOUND J, 1984, RD PATENTS PRODUCTIV
[10]  
BRYSON A, 2002, 4 HM STAT OFF