Some evidence on the importance of sticky prices

被引:775
作者
Bils, M [1 ]
Klenow, PJ
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/422559
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the frequency of price changes for 350 categories of goods and services covering about 70 percent of consumer spending, on the basis of unpublished data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for 1995-97. In comparison with previous studies, we find much more frequent price changes, with half of prices lasting less than 4.3 months. Even excluding temporary price cuts (sales), we find that half of prices last 5.5 months or less. We also find that the frequency of price changes differs dramatically across goods. Compared to the predictions of popular sticky-price models, actual inflation rates are far more volatile and transient for sticky-price goods.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 985
页数:39
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SCANNER DATA PRICE I
[2]  
BAHARAD E, 2003, UNPUB PRICE RIGIDITY
[3]   THEORY OF MONOPOLISTIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT [J].
BARRO, RJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1972, 39 (117) :17-26
[4]  
BILS M, 1987, AM ECON REV, V77, P838
[5]  
Bils M, 2002, 9069 NBER
[6]  
Blinder A., 1998, ASKING PRICES NEW AP
[7]   STAGGERED PRICES IN A UTILITY-MAXIMIZING FRAMEWORK [J].
CALVO, GA .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1983, 12 (03) :383-398
[8]   MENU COSTS AND THE NEUTRALITY OF MONEY [J].
CAPLIN, AS ;
SPULBER, DF .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (04) :703-725
[9]  
CARLTON DW, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P637
[10]   Durability versus concentration as an explanation for price inflexibility [J].
Caucutt, EM ;
Ghosh, M ;
Kelton, CML .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1999, 14 (01) :27-50