The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing

被引:239
作者
Luo, Zheng [1 ]
Chen, Xu [1 ]
Wang, Xiaojun [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Management, Bristol BS8 1TZ, Avon, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Low carbon manufacturing; Co-opetition; Carbon emission reduction; Green technology investment; Game theory; CONSUMER ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS; SUPPLY CHAIN; COLLABORATION; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; FOOTPRINTS; BEHAVIOR; POLICIES; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.030
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Low carbon manufacturing has become a strategic objective for many developed and developing economies. This study examines the role of co-opetition in achieving this objective. We investigate the pricing and emissions reduction policies for two rival manufacturers with different emission reduction efficiencies under the cap-and-trade policy. We assume that the product demand is price and emission sensitive. Based on non-cooperative and cooperative games, the optimal solutions for the two manufacturers are derived in the purely competitive and co-opetitive market environments respectively. Through the discussion and numerical analysis, we uncovered that in both pure competition and co-opetition models, the two manufacturers' optimal prices depend on the unit price of carbon emission trading. In addition, higher emission reduction efficiency leads to lower optimal unit carbon emissions and higher profit in both the pure competition and co-petition models. Interestingly, compared to pure competition, co-opetition will lead to more profit and less total carbon emissions. However, the improvement in economic and environmental performance is based on higher product prices and unit carbon emissions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 403
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Transitional politics: emerging incentive-based instruments in environmental regulation [J].
Aidt, TS ;
Dutta, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (03) :458-479
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INT J BUS SOC
[3]   Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance [J].
Arora, S ;
Gangopadhyay, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1995, 28 (03) :289-309
[4]   Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers [J].
Bansal, S ;
Gangopadhyay, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :333-355
[5]   Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models [J].
Benjaafar, Saif ;
Li, Yanzhi ;
Daskin, Mark .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 10 (01) :99-116
[6]  
Berners-Lee M., 2011, How bad are bananas? The carbon footprint of everything
[7]   Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development [J].
Bhaskaran, Sreekumar R. ;
Krishnan, V. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (07) :1152-1169
[8]   Including sustainability criteria into inventory models [J].
Bouchery, Yann ;
Ghaffari, Asma ;
Jemai, Zied ;
Dallery, Yves .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 222 (02) :229-240
[9]   Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme [J].
Chaabane, A. ;
Ramudhin, A. ;
Paquet, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 135 (01) :37-49
[10]   Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development [J].
Chen, CL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (02) :250-263