A comparison of sucralfate and ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation

被引:469
作者
Cook, D
Guyatt, G
Marshall, J
Leasa, D
Fuller, H
Hall, R
Peters, S
Rutledge, F
Griffith, L
McLellan, A
Wood, G
Kirby, A
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS, Canada
[5] Mem Univ Newfoundland, St John, NF, Canada
[6] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199803193381203
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation are at increased risk for gastrointestinal bleeding from stress ulcers. There are conflicting data on the effect of histamine H-2-receptor antagonists and the cytoprotective agent sucralfate on rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality. Methods In a multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial, we compared sucralfate with the H-2-receptor antagonist ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 1200 patients who required mechanical ventilation. Patients received either nasogastric sucralfate suspension (1 g every six hours) and an intravenous placebo or intravenous ranitidine (50 mg every eight hours) and a nasogastric placebo. Results The patients in the two groups had similar base-line characteristics. Clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding developed in 10 of 596 (1.7 percent) of the patients receiving ranitidine, as compared with 23 of 604 (3.8 percent) of those receiving sucralfate (relative risk, 0.44; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.92; P = 0.02). In the ranitidine group, 114 of 596 patients (19.1 percent) had ventilator-associated pneumonia, as compared with 98 of 604 (16.2 percent) in the sucralfate group (relative risk, 1.18; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.51; P = 0.19). There was no significant difference between the groups in mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) (23.5 percent in the ranitidine group and 22.8 percent in the sucralfate group) or the duration of the stay in the ICU (median, nine days in both groups). Conclusions Among critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation, those receiving ranitidine had a significantly lower rate of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding than those treated with sucralfate. There were no significant differences in the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the duration of the stay in the ICU, or mortality. (C) 1998, Massachusetts Medical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 797
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Aitkin M., 1989, STAT MODELLING GLIM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V139, P1058
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Clin Intensive Care
[4]  
ATHERTON ST, 1978, LANCET, V2, P968
[5]   Prophylaxis for stress-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A cost effectiveness analysis [J].
BenMenachem, T ;
McCarthy, BD ;
Fogel, R ;
Schiffman, RM ;
Patel, RV ;
Zarowitz, BJ ;
Nerenz, DR ;
Bresalier, RS .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (02) :338-345
[6]   PROPHYLAXIS FOR STRESS-RELATED GASTRIC HEMORRHAGE IN THE MEDICAL INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED, SINGLE-BLIND STUDY [J].
BENMENACHEM, T ;
FOGEL, R ;
PATEL, RV ;
TOUCHETTE, M ;
ZAROWITZ, BJ ;
HADZIJAHIC, N ;
DIVINE, G ;
VERTER, J ;
BRESALIER, RS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (08) :568-+
[7]   COMPARISON OF ANTACID AND SUCRALFATE IN THE PREVENTION OF GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WHO ARE CRITICALLY ILL [J].
BORRERO, E ;
BANK, S ;
MARGOLIS, I ;
SCHULMAN, ND ;
CHARDAVOYNE, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 79 (2C) :62-64
[8]   PROPHYLAXIS OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT BLEEDING IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS - A RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF SUCRALFATE, CIMETIDINE, AND ANTACIDS [J].
CANNON, LA ;
HEISELMAN, D ;
GARDNER, W ;
JONES, J .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 147 (12) :2101-2106
[9]   RISK-FACTORS FOR GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
FULLER, HD ;
GUYATT, GH ;
MARSHALL, JC ;
LEASA, D ;
HALL, R ;
WINTON, TL ;
RUTLEDGE, F ;
TODD, TJR ;
ROY, P ;
LACROIX, J ;
GRIFFITH, L ;
WILLAN, A ;
NOSEWORTHY, T ;
POWLES, P ;
OPPENHEIMER, L ;
HEWSON, J ;
LANG, J ;
LEE, H ;
GUSLITS, B ;
HEULE, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (06) :377-381
[10]  
Cook DJ, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V275, P308, DOI 10.1001/jama.275.4.308