The role of context in the communication of uncertain beliefs

被引:21
作者
Fox, CR
Irwin, JR
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15324834basp2001_6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Most decisions require an evaluation of the likelihood of events on which outcomes depend. A common mode of judgment under uncertainty is the interpretation of statements of belief expressed by others. Most previous research on the communication of uncertainty has focused on the interpretation and use of quantitative versus qualitative expressions (e.g., "90% chance" vs. "extremely likely"); in addition, a handful of articles have addressed the effects of contextual base rates on the interpretation of expressed beliefs. In this article we argue that the social, informational, motivational, and discourse context in which beliefs are constructed and statements are formulated provides myriad additional cues that influence what is expressed by speakers and what is understood by listeners. We advance a framework for organizing the six sources of information on which listeners rely (in addition to the denotation of the speaker's words) when updating beliefs under uncertainty: (a) the listener's prior beliefs and assumptions about the world; (b) the listener's interpretation of the social and informational context in which the speaker's beliefs were formed; (c) the listener's evaluation of the speaker's credibility and judgmental tendencies; (d) the listener's interpretation of the social and motivational context in which the statement was made; (e) the listener's understanding of information conveyed directly and indirectly by the speaker; and (f) the listener's interpretation of the social and discourse context in which the statement was embedded. Throughout this article we cite relevant research from decision making and social psychology, as well as examples from the risk communication literature. We conclude with some comments on the transmission of uncertain beliefs in groups, followed by a general discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, PSYCHOL ATTITUDE
[2]   INDIVIDUAL VERSUS GROUP USE OF BASE-RATE AND INDIVIDUATING INFORMATION [J].
ARGOTE, L ;
SEABRIGHT, MA ;
DYER, L .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1986, 38 (01) :65-75
[3]  
AUGUSTINE NR, 1995, HARVARD BUSINESS NOV, P147
[4]   VERBAL PROBABILITIES - AMBIGUOUS, CONTEXT-DEPENDENT, OR BOTH [J].
BRUN, W ;
TEIGEN, KH .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1988, 41 (03) :390-404
[5]   CONSISTENCY IN INTERPRETATION OF PROBABILISTIC PHRASES [J].
BUDESCU, DV ;
WALLSTEN, TS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 36 (03) :391-405
[6]   DYADIC DECISIONS WITH NUMERICAL AND VERBAL PROBABILITIES [J].
BUDESCU, DV ;
WALLSTEN, TS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 46 (02) :240-263
[7]  
BUDESCU DV, 1995, DECISION MAKING COGN
[8]   TESTING 2 CLASSES OF THEORIES ABOUT GROUP INDUCED SHIFTS IN INDIVIDUAL CHOICE [J].
BURNSTEIN, E ;
VINOKUR, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 9 (02) :123-137
[9]   WHAT A PERSON THINKS UPON LEARNING HE HAS CHOSEN DIFFERENTLY FROM OTHERS - NICE EVIDENCE FOR PERSUASIVE-ARGUMENTS EXPLANATION OF CHOICE SHIFTS [J].
BURNSTEIN, E ;
VINOKUR, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 11 (05) :412-426
[10]   IMPROVING RISK COMMUNICATION IN GOVERNMENT - RESEARCH PRIORITIES [J].
CHESS, C ;
SALOMONE, KL ;
HANCE, BJ .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (02) :127-135