Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment

被引:558
作者
Shah, J [1 ]
Higgins, ET [1 ]
Friedman, RS [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.285
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Study 1 demonstrated that as individuals' promotion-related ideal strength increases, performance on an anagram task is greater for a monetary task incentive framed in terms of gains and nongains (i.e., promotion framed) than one framed in terms of losses and nonlosses (i.e., prevention framed), whereas the reverse is true as individuals' prevention-related ought strength increases. Study 2 further demonstrated that with promotion-framed task incentives, individuals' ideal strength increases motivation for promotion-related goal attainment means (gaining points), whereas with prevention-framed task incentives, individuals' ought strength increases motivation for prevention-related means (avoiding losing points). These results suggest that motivation and performance are greater when the regulatory focus of task incentives and means match (vs. mismatch) the chronic regulatory focus of the performers.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 293
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Adler A., 1923, The practice and theory of individual psychology
[2]  
Allport F. H., 1955, THEORIES PERCEPTION
[3]   ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVE AND TEST ANXIETY CONCEIVED AS MOTIVE TO APPROACH SUCCESS AND MOTIVE TO AVOID FAILURE [J].
ATKINSON, JW ;
LITWIN, GH .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 60 (01) :52-63
[5]   Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength [J].
Bassili, JN .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (04) :637-653
[6]  
Bowlby J., 1969, ATTACHMENT LOSS, V1
[7]   SENSITIVITY TO VARYING GAINS AND LOSSES - THE ROLE OF SELF-DISCREPANCIES AND EVENT FRAMING [J].
BRENDL, CM ;
HIGGINS, ET ;
LEMM, KM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 69 (06) :1028-1051
[8]   Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? [J].
Brendl, CM ;
Higgins, ET .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 28 :95-160
[9]  
Bruner J.S., 1951, PERCEPTION APPROACH, P121, DOI DOI 10.1037/11505-005
[10]  
Bruner Jerome, 1950, PERCEPTION PERSONALI