Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models

被引:125
作者
Sonnier, Garrett
Ainslie, Andrew
Otter, Thomas
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
QME-QUANTITATIVE MARKETING AND ECONOMICS | 2007年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
Bayesian analysis; choice modeling; willingness-to-pay;
D O I
10.1007/s11129-007-9024-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate direct and indirect specification of the distribution of consumer willingness-to-pay (WTP) for changes in product attributes in a choice setting. Typically, choice models identify WTP for an attribute as a ratio of the estimated attribute and price coefficients. Previous research in marketing and economics has discussed the problems with allowing for random coefficients on both attribute and price, especially when the distribution of the price coefficient has mass near zero. These problems can be avoided by combining a parameterization of the likelihood function that directly identifies WTP with a normal prior for WTP. We show that the typical likelihood parameterization in combination with what are regarded as standard heterogeneity distributions for attribute and price coefficients results in poorly behaved posterior WTP distributions, especially in small sample settings. The implied prior for WTP readily allows for substantial mass in the tails of the distribution and extreme individual-level estimates of WTP. We also demonstrate the sensitivity of profit maximizing prices to parameterization and priors for WTP.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 331
页数:19
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   MODELING HOUSEHOLD PURCHASE BEHAVIOR WITH LOGISTIC NORMAL REGRESSION [J].
ALLENBY, GM ;
LENK, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 89 (428) :1218-1231
[2]   An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Ainslie, A ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (04) :479-487
[3]   A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand [J].
Arora, N ;
Allenby, GM ;
Ginter, JL .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 17 (01) :29-44
[4]   ESTIMATING WILLINGNESS TO PAY FROM SURVEY DATA - AN ALTERNATIVE PRE-TEST-MARKET EVALUATION PROCEDURE [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
JAMES, MD .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1987, 24 (04) :389-395
[5]   Multivariate analysis of multiple response data [J].
Edwards, YD ;
Allenby, GM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2003, 40 (03) :321-334
[6]   A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules [J].
Gilbride, TJ ;
Allenby, GM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (03) :391-406
[7]   Measuring heterogeneous reservation prices for product bundles [J].
Jedidi, K ;
Jagpal, S ;
Manchanda, P .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2003, 22 (01) :107-130
[8]   Augmenting conjoint analysis to estimate consumer reservation price [J].
Jedidi, K ;
Zhang, ZJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (10) :1350-1368
[9]   Dynamic models incorporating individual heterogeneity: Utility evolution in conjoint analysis [J].
Liechty, JC ;
Fong, DKH ;
DeSarbo, WS .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2005, 24 (02) :285-293
[10]   Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients [J].
Meijer, E ;
Rouwendal, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2006, 21 (02) :227-244