A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias

被引:6416
作者
Bolstad, BM [1 ]
Irizarry, RA
Åstrand, M
Speed, TP
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Grp Biostat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] AstraZeneca, R&D, Molndal, Sweden
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Stat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] WEHI, Div Genet & Bioinformat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: When running experiments that involve multiple high density oligonucleotide arrays, it is important to remove sources of variation between arrays of non-biological origin. Normalization is a process for reducing this variation. It is common to see non-linear relations between arrays and the standard normalization provided by Affymetrix does not perform well in these situations. Results: We present three methods of performing normalization at the probe intensity level. These methods are called complete data methods because they make use of data from all arrays in an experiment to form the normalizing relation. These algorithms are compared to two methods that make use of a baseline array: a one number scaling based algorithm and a method that uses a non-linear normalizing relation by comparing the variability and bias of an expression measure. Two publicly available datasets are used to carry out the comparisons. The simplest and quickest complete data method is found to perform favorably. Availablity: Software implementing all three of the complete data normalization methods is available as part of the R package Affy, which is a part of the Bioconductor project http://www.bioconductor.org. Contact: bolstad@stat.berkeley.edu Supplementary information: Additional figures may be found at http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/similar tobolstad/normalize/ index.html.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*AFFYMETRIX, 2001, STAT ALG REF GUID
[2]  
ASTRAND M, 2001, UNPUB NORMALIZING OL
[3]  
BOLSTAD B, 2001, UNPUB PROBE LEVEL QU
[4]   LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION - AN APPROACH TO REGRESSION-ANALYSIS BY LOCAL FITTING [J].
CLEVELAND, WS ;
DEVLIN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 83 (403) :596-610
[5]  
Dudoit S, 2002, STAT SINICA, V12, P111
[6]  
*GENELOGIC, 2002, DATASETS
[7]  
Hartemink A J., 2001, SPIE BIOS 2001
[8]  
Ihaka R., 1996, J COMPUTATIONAL GRAP, V5, P299, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713, 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713, 10.2307/1390807]
[9]  
IZIRARRY RA, 2003, IN PRESS BIOSTATISTI
[10]   High density synthetic oligonucleotide arrays [J].
Lipshutz, RJ ;
Fodor, SPA ;
Gingeras, TR ;
Lockhart, DJ .
NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 21 (Suppl 1) :20-24