Big Data Analytics for Prostate Radiotherapy

被引:28
作者
Coates, James [1 ]
Souhami, Luis [2 ]
El Naqa, Issam [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Oncol, Oxford, England
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Div Radiat Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
radiotherapy; data mining; machine learning; big data; systems radiobiology; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; COMPLICATION PROBABILITY-MODELS; RADIATION PNEUMONITIS RISK; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; TUMOR-CONTROL PROBABILITY; NORMAL TISSUE TOXICITIES; DOSE-VOLUME HISTOGRAMS; LINEAR-QUADRATIC MODEL; CARBON-ION RADIATION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2016.00149
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation therapy is a first-line treatment option for localized prostate cancer and radiation-induced normal tissue damage are often the main limiting factor for modern radiotherapy regimens. Conversely, under-dosing of target volumes in an attempt to spare adjacent healthy tissues limits the likelihood of achieving local, long-term control. Thus, the ability to generate personalized data-driven risk profiles for radiotherapy outcomes would provide valuable prognostic information to help guide both clinicians and patients alike. Big data applied to radiation oncology promises to deliver better understanding of outcomes by harvesting and integrating heterogeneous data types, including patient-specific clinical parameters, treatment-related dose volume metrics, and biological risk factors. When taken together, such variables make up the basis for a multi-dimensional space (the "RadoncSpace") in which the presented modeling techniques search in order to identify significant predictors. Herein, we review outcome modeling and big data-mining techniques for both tumor control and radiotherapy induced normal tissue effects. We apply many of the presented modeling approaches onto a cohort of hypofractionated prostate cancer patients taking into account different data types and a large heterogeneous mix of physical and biological parameters. Cross validation techniques are also reviewed for the refinement of the proposed framework architecture and checking individual model performance. We conclude by considering advanced modeling techniques that borrow concepts from big data analytics, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, before discussing the potential future impact of systems radiobiology approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]   High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses [J].
Abd El-Rehim, DM ;
Ball, G ;
Pinder, SE ;
Rakha, E ;
Paish, C ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Macmillan, D ;
Blamey, RW ;
Ellis, IO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) :340-350
[2]  
Acosta O, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6367, P42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-15989-3_6
[3]  
Adamus-Gorka Magdalena, 2011, Cancers (Basel), V3, P2421, DOI 10.3390/cancers3022421
[4]   Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC [J].
Aho, Ken ;
Derryberry, DeWayne ;
Peterson, Teri .
ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (03) :631-636
[5]  
Akaike H., 1992, 2 INT S INF THEOR, P610, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0, 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-538, 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38, 10.1007/978-0-387-98135-2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-538]
[6]  
Alaiya AA, 2000, ELECTROPHORESIS, V21, P1210, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000401)21:6<1210::AID-ELPS1210>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-S
[8]   Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology [J].
Anagnostou, T ;
Remzi, M ;
Lykourinas, M ;
Djavan, D .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) :596-603
[9]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV PREPR
[10]  
[Anonymous], TREATM ROUT PROST CA