The different effects of basic research in enterprises on economic growth: Income-level quantile analysis

被引:10
作者
Jung, Euy-Young [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xielin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Youth Apartment 7-317,Zhongguancun East Rd 80, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Engn Res, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
关键词
basic research; business sector; economic growth; national income level; quantile regression; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; TECH; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scz009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the open innovation era, enterprises should conduct more of their own basic research or not rely on contextual factors. We use quantile regression to determine that basic research in the business sector has different effects on economic performance by national income level using thirty-one Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and non-OECD countries including China during 1996-2014. We find that basic research expenditure has a negative relationship with economic growth in low-income countries, whereas in high-income countries, the relationship is positive. Furthermore, the greater the national income, the higher the importance of basic research for economic growth. However, increased absorptive capacity mediates the positive relationship between basic research investment and economic growth in high-income countries, and, in low-income countries, it mediates the negative relationship between the two. In this study, we provide a more detailed understanding of the relationships between basic research investment in the business sector and economic growth.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 588
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aghion P., 1990, A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction
[2]   A multi-dimensional approach for managing open innovation in NPD [J].
Bahemia, Hanna ;
Squire, Brian ;
Cousins, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 37 (10) :1366-1385
[3]   WHY SOME R-AND-D ORGANIZATIONS ARE MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN OTHERS [J].
BEAN, AS .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1995, 38 (01) :25-29
[4]  
Bush Vannevar., 1945, SCI THE ENDLESS FRON
[5]   Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments [J].
Cassiman, B ;
Pérez-Castrillo, D ;
Veugelers, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2002, 20 (06) :775-799
[6]  
Chesbrough H, 2004, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V47, P23
[7]   Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (397) :569-596
[8]   Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries [J].
Czarnitzki, Dirk ;
Thorwarth, Susanne .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (09) :1555-1564
[9]   Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation [J].
Fabrizio, Kira R. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (02) :255-267
[10]   R&D spending in the high-tech sector and economic growth [J].
Falk, Martin .
RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (03) :140-147