Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital

被引:180
作者
Walter, Jorge
Lechner, Christoph
Kellermanns, Franz W.
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Univ St Gallen, Inst Management, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Management & Informat Syst, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
inter- and intrafirm networks; knowledge transfer; social capital; strategic alliances;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.026
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the process through which multilevel network structures translate into knowledge acquisition from alliance partners. The degree of knowledge transfer a multidivisional company achieves from its network of alliance partners is determined not only by the organization's external network structure, but also by the structure of relationships among its business units. By distinguishing two perspectives on the distribution of social capital's benefits - private versus collective - this article's approach reconciles the competing views on what types of network structures create social capital, that is, the brokerage and closure views of the social network literature. Private benefits of brokerage and centrality are more beneficial in interfirm networks, whereas collective benefits provided by network closure and low levels of centralization are more beneficial in intrafirm networks. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 710
页数:13
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   Social capital: Prospects for a new concept [J].
Adler, PS ;
Kwon, SW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :17-40
[2]  
Afuah A, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P387
[3]  
Ahuja G, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-B
[5]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[6]   Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study [J].
Ahuja, MK ;
Galletta, DF ;
Carley, KM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (01) :21-38
[7]   The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation [J].
Andersson, U ;
Forsgren, M ;
Holm, U .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (11) :979-996
[8]  
[Anonymous], BLACKWELL COMPANION
[9]   Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms [J].
Argote, L ;
Ingram, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :150-169
[10]  
Bae JH, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P843