Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets?

被引:144
作者
Gibson, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Board, Washington, DC 20551 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/4126771
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
I test whether corporate governance is ineffective in emerging markets by estimating the link between CEO turnover and firm performance for over 1,200 firms in eight emerging markets. I find two main results. First, CEOs of emerging market firms are more likely to lose their jobs when their firm's performance is poor, suggesting that corporate governance is not ineffective in emerging markets. Second, for the subset of firms with a large domestic shareholder, there is no link between CEO turnover and firm performance. For this subset of emerging market firms, corporate governance appears to be ineffective.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 250
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Chief executive turnover and firm performance in Japan [J].
Abe, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 1997, 11 (01) :2-26
[2]  
[Anonymous], CRISIS CHANGE JAPANE
[3]   Foreign ownership and profitability: Property rights, control, and the performance of firms in Indian industry [J].
Chhibber, PK ;
Majumdar, SK .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1999, 42 (01) :209-238
[4]  
Chung K.H., 1999, J CORP FINANC, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0929-1199(98)00014-5
[5]   Ownership concentration and corporate performance in the Czech Republic [J].
Claessens, S ;
Djankov, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 1999, 27 (03) :498-513
[6]   Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings [J].
Claessens, S ;
Djankov, S ;
Fan, JPH ;
Lang, LHP .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (06) :2741-2771
[7]   Enterprise performance and management turnover in the Czech Republic [J].
Claessens, S ;
Djankov, S .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 43 (4-6) :1115-1124
[8]  
CLAESSENS S., 1999, 2054 WORLD BANK
[9]  
COOMBES P, 2001, DIRECTORSHIP, V27, P4
[10]   Stock market development and financial intermediaries: Stylized facts [J].
Demirguc-kunt, A ;
Levine, R .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 10 (02) :291-321