Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making

被引:120
作者
Li, Deng-Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenyang Inst Aeronaut Engn, Dept Sci, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Naval Acad, Dept 5, Dalian 116018, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Air Force Engn Univ, Missile Inst, Sahyuan 713800, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making; linguistic variable; fuzzy number; compromise ratio method; TOPSIS; comparative analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2006.02.003
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to develop a compromise ratio ( CR) methodology for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making ( FMAGDM), which is an important part of decision support system. Owing to fuzziness being inherent in decision data and group decision making processes, the crisp values are inadequate to model real-life situations. In this paper, the weights of all attributes and the ratings of each alternative with respect to each attribute are described by linguistic terms which can be expressed in trapezoid fuzzy numbers. A fuzzy distance measure is developed to calculate difference between trapezoid fuzzy numbers. The compromise ratio method for FMAGDM is developed by introducing the ranking index based on the concept that the chosen alternative should be as close as possible to the ideal solution and as far away from the negative-ideal solution as possible simultaneously. The computation principle and procedure of the compromise ratio method are described in detail in this paper. Moreover the TOPSIS method which was developed for multi-attribute decision making ( MADM) with crisp decision data is analyzed and extended to multi-attribute group decision making ( MAGDM) under fuzzy environments. A comparative analysis of the compromise ratio method and the extended fuzzy TOPSIS method is illustrated with a numerical example, showing their similarity and some differences. (c) 2006 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 817
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Determining fuzzy membership functions with tabu search - an application to control [J].
Bagis, A .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2003, 139 (01) :209-225
[2]   Multiobjective linguistic optimization [J].
Carlsson, C ;
Fullér, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :5-10
[3]   Dynamical membership functions: an approach for adaptive fuzzy modelling [J].
Cerrada, M ;
Aguilar, J ;
Colina, E ;
Titli, A .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2005, 152 (03) :513-533
[4]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[5]  
CHEN SJ, 1992, LECT NOTES ECON MATH, V375, P1
[6]   Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation [J].
Cheng, CH ;
Lin, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) :174-186
[7]   Fuzzy iteration methodology for reservoir flood control operation [J].
Cheng, CT ;
Chau, KW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2001, 37 (05) :1381-1388
[8]   Generalized evaluation in decision analysis [J].
Danielson, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 162 (02) :442-449
[9]   Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights [J].
Deng, H ;
Yeh, CH ;
Willis, RJ .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (10) :963-973
[10]  
DENGFENG L, 2002, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ, V10, P385