Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning

被引:104
作者
Cohnen, M
Poll, LW
Puettmann, C
Ewen, K
Saleh, A
Mödder, U
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Univ Hosp, Inst Diagnost Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] State Inst Occupat Safety & Hlth N Rhine Westfali, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
radiation exposure; multi-slice CT; effective dose; Alderson-Rando phantom;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-002-1614-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation exposure of patients in several standard protocols in multi-slice CT (MSCT). Scanning protocols for neck, chest, abdomen, and spine were examined on a Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom MSCT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with changing slice collimation (4x1, 4x2.5, and 4x5 mm), and pitch factors (1, 1.5, and 2). Effective doses were calculated from LiF-TLD measurements at several organ sites using an Alderson-Rando phantom and compared with calculations using the weighted CTDI. Effective dose for MSCT of the neck was 2.8 mSv. For different protocols for MSCT of the chest, 7.5-12.9 mSv were found. In abdominal MSCT protocols, effective dose varied between 12.4 and 16.1 mSv. The MSCT of the spine may lead to 12 mSv. An excellent correlation between the effective dose as determined by LiF-TLD and the calculated effective dose using the weighted CTDI could be demonstrated; however, a difference of up to 30% (mean 14.3%) was noted. Standard protocols for MSCT as measured in this study showed effective doses of up to 16 mSv. Phantom measurement data show a good correlation to estimations using the weighted CTDI.
引用
收藏
页码:1148 / 1153
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ANN ICRP, V60
[2]  
Cohnen M, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1654
[3]   Radiation exposure in multi-slice CT of the heart [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Poll, L ;
Püttmann, C ;
Ewen, K ;
Mödder, U .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2001, 173 (04) :295-299
[4]   Technical advances in multi-slice spiral CT [J].
Fuchs, T ;
Kachelriess, M ;
Kalender, WA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (02) :69-73
[5]   System performance of multislice spiral computed tomography [J].
Fuchs, TOJ ;
Kachelriess, M ;
Kalender, WA .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2000, 19 (05) :63-70
[6]   The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters [J].
Fung, KKL ;
Gilboy, WB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (880) :358-367
[7]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR ASSESSING PATIENT DOSE FROM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
GELEIJNS, J ;
VANUNNIK, JG ;
ZOETELIEF, J ;
ZWEERS, D ;
BROERSE, JJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (796) :360-365
[8]  
Ghaye B, 2000, JBR-BTR, V83, P271
[9]   CT colonography: Single-versus multi-detector row imaging [J].
Hara, AK ;
Johnson, CD ;
MacCarty, RL ;
Welch, TJ ;
McCollough, CH ;
Harmen, WS .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (02) :461-465
[10]   Radiation exposure in spiral computed tomography -: Dose distribution and dose reduction [J].
Hidajat, N ;
Mäurer, J ;
Schröder, RJ ;
Wolf, M ;
Vogl, T ;
Felix, R .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (01) :51-57