Who Benefits Most from College? Evidence for Negative Selection in Heterogeneous Economic Returns to Higher Education

被引:425
作者
Brand, Jennie E. [1 ]
Xie, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Sociol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
college education; economic returns; selection bias; heterogeneity; negative selection; MAINTAINED INEQUALITY; CAUSAL; ATTAINMENT; ATTENDANCE; EARNINGS; ABILITY; INCOME; STRATIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0003122410363567
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
In this article, we consider how the economic return to a college education varies across members of the U.S. population. Based on principles of comparative advantage, scholars commonly presume that positive selection is at work, that is, individuals who are most likely to select into college also benefit most from college. Net of observed economic and noneconomic factors influencing college attendance, we conjecture that individuals who are least likely to obtain a college education benefit the most from college. We call this theory the negative selection hypothesis. To adjudicate between the two hypotheses, we study the effects of completing college on earnings by propensity score strata using an innovative hierarchical linear model with data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 and the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. For both cohorts, for both men and women, and for every observed stage of the life course, we find evidence suggesting negative selection. Results from auxiliary analyses lend further support to the negative selection hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 302
页数:30
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   The effects of family characteristics on the return to education [J].
Altonji, JG ;
Dunn, TA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1996, 78 (04) :692-704
[2]  
Angrist J., 1999, Handb. Labor Econ., V3, P1277, DOI [10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03004-7, DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03004-7]
[3]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[4]  
[Anonymous], STUDIES SUPPLY DEMAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1967, The American occupational structure (4275)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Handbook of Labor Economics, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03011-4
[7]  
ARMER J, 1964, THESIS U WISCONSIN M
[8]  
ASHENFELTER O, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P1157
[9]   Income, schooling, and ability: Evidence from a new sample of identical twins [J].
Ashenfelter, O ;
Rouse, C .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (01) :253-284
[10]   College attendance and the college wage premium: Differences by gender [J].
Averett, SL ;
Burton, ML .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 1996, 15 (01) :37-49