State and local government choices in fiscal redistribution

被引:40
作者
Bahl, R [1 ]
Martinez-Vazquez, J [1 ]
Wallace, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Andrew Young Sch Policy Studies, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
D O I
10.17310/ntj.2002.4.04
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Economists have devoted relatively little attention to explaining why some state and local governments choose more progressive fiscal instruments than others. This paper provides an empirical model to identify the determinants of income redistribution as a budgetary choice, and estimates the strength of these determinants with state-local government panel data for a 21 year period. We find emphasis on redistributive expenditures in less urbanized and poorer states, and more emphasis on redistributive revenues in states that are less urbanized, poorer, and with larger elderly and black populations. We find that state-local governments use revenue and expenditure distribution instruments as complements.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 742
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   WHO BENEFITS FROM INDEXATION [J].
ALM, J ;
ZUBROW, RA .
PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY, 1987, 15 (01) :27-44
[2]  
Alm J., 1996, DETERMINANTS STATE T
[3]  
BAHL R, 1996, RES PAPERS SERIES GE, V58
[5]   ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM [J].
BROWN, CC ;
OATES, WE .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1987, 32 (03) :307-330
[6]   Welfare reform and the race to the bottom: Theory and evidence [J].
Brueckner, JK .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2000, 66 (03) :505-525
[7]  
BUCHANAN JM, 1974, P 67 ANN C TAX WASH, P343
[8]  
CHAMBERS JG, 1998, GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION
[9]   A MODEL OF THE DISTRIBUTIONAL INCIDENCE OF STATE AND LOCAL-TAXES [J].
CHERNICK, H .
PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 20 (04) :572-585
[10]  
CHERNICK H, 1991, TRED C BOST