Improved Hydrogeophysical Parameter Estimation from Empirical Mode Decomposition Processed Ground Penetrating Radar Data

被引:11
作者
Addison, Adrian D. [1 ]
Battista, Bradley M. [1 ]
Knapp, Camelia C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Dept Geol Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
SOIL;
D O I
10.2113/JEEG14.4.171
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Various techniques have been designed to maximize the use of ground penetrating radar (GPR) as an exploration tool. Improvements in signal processing are expected to further facilitate the accuracy of parameters derived from using GPR in certain geologic environments. Common-offset GPR data were collected at the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) in Beaufort, South Carolina, and dielectric constants were calculated following the application of the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) for dewowing GPR traces. Conventional signal processing is applied to the GPR traces to provide hydrogeophysical parameter estimates such as volumetric water content, porosity, and hydraulic conductivity. The results are validated using a coincident vertical radar profile, existing hydraulic data from direct measurements, and comparing EMD derived parameters with those non-EMD derived. The results of the comparison between the EMD and non-EMD methods show improved hydrogeophysical estimations from the EMD processed data. Dielectric constant (k) values from the non-EMD method are outside the range of the values for all geologic materials (k <= 40). The subsequent parameter estimates using dielectric constants derived from non-EMD processed data yield erroneous results therefore justifying the use of EMD as a method in dewowing GPR data for quantitative analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ANNAN AP, 2005, GPR METHODS HYDROGEO
[2]  
Bear J., 1988, DYNAMICS FLUIDS PORO
[3]   GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION MAPPING OF SOIL AND ROCK STRATIGRAPHY [J].
DAVIS, JL ;
ANNAN, AP .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1989, 37 (05) :531-551
[4]  
Freeze A.R., 1979, GROUNDWATER
[5]  
Gerlitz K., 1993, P S APPL GEOPHYS ENG, P564
[6]   Estimation of hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined aquifer using cokriging of GPR and hydrostratigraphic data [J].
Gloaguen, E ;
Chouteau, M ;
Marcotte, D ;
Chapuis, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2001, 47 (02) :135-152
[7]   Ground-penetrating-radar-assisted saturation and permeability estimation in bimodal systems [J].
Hubbard, SS ;
Rubin, Y ;
Majer, E .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (05) :971-990
[8]  
KUTRUBES DL, 1994, EXPANDED ABSTRACTS, P439
[9]   Effects of signal processing and antenna frequency on the geostatistical structure of ground-penetrating radar data [J].
Oldenborger, GA ;
Knoll, MD ;
Barrash, W .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING GEOPHYSICS, 2004, 9 (04) :201-212
[10]  
RHINE J, 2000, GROUNDWATER CHARACTE