Comparison of methods for determining cricopharyngeal intrabolus pressure in normal patients as possible indicator for cricopharyngeal myotomy

被引:23
作者
Bammer, T
Salassa, JR
Klingler, PJ
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mhn.2002.128554
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE., We sought to compare methods for determining intrabolus cricopharyngeal pressure as a possible indicator for cricopharyngeal myotomy. STUDY DESIGN: We determined multiple intrabolus pressures in the cricopharyngeal region of 20 normal volunteers, of whom 12 were 20 to 35 years old and 8 were older than 75 years. Data were collected using a commercially available manofluorography system and a 6-sensor unidirectional solid-state 2- x 4-mm catheter. Each subject underwent 5 5-mL and 5 10-ml. liquid barium swallows. Data were analyzed, and young subjects were compared with old subjects. RESULTS: The mean mid-bolus pressures in young subjects were 5.2 +/- 4.9 mm Hg and 7.2 +/- 6.5 mm Hg for the 5-ml. and 10-ml. swallows, respectively, and in older subjects, 10.8 +/- 8.8 mm Hg and 12.3 +/- 7.4 mm Hg. The mean gradient pressures across the 3-cm cricopharyngeal region in young subjects were 2.02 +/- 5.0 mm Hg, and - 0.91 +/- 4.8 mm Hg for the 5-ml. and 10-ml. swallows, respectively, and for older subjects, 4.38 +/- 3.1 mm Hg and 2.82 +/- 3.4 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Cricopharyngeal intrabolus pressures were lower in young than in older subjects. The mid-bolus pressure and the gradient pressure across the cricopharyngeal region appeared to be the most consistent methods for evaluating intrabolus pressures. SIGNIFICANCE Intrabolus pressure anomalies in the cricopharyngeal region have been proposed as an indicator for selecting patients who would benefit from cricopharyngeal myotomy. The methods of determining intrabolus pressures vary, with resulting variations in recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Predictors of outcome following cricopharyngeal disruption for pharyngeal dysphagia [J].
Ali, GN ;
Wallace, KL ;
Laundl, TM ;
Hunt, DR ;
deCarle, DJ ;
Cook, IJ .
DYSPHAGIA, 1997, 12 (03) :133-139
[2]   PREVALENCE OF SUBJECTIVE DYSPHAGIA IN COMMUNITY RESIDENTS AGED OVER 87 [J].
BLOEM, BR ;
LAGAAY, AM ;
VANBEEK, W ;
HAAN, J ;
ROOS, RAC ;
WINTZEN, AR .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6726) :721-722
[3]   OPENING MECHANISMS OF THE HUMAN UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER [J].
COOK, IJ ;
DODDS, WJ ;
DANTAS, RO ;
MASSEY, B ;
KERN, MK ;
LANG, IM ;
BRASSEUR, JG ;
HOGAN, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 257 (05) :G748-G759
[4]   BIOMECHANICS OF CRICOPHARYNGEAL BARS [J].
DANTAS, RO ;
COOK, IJ ;
DODDS, WJ ;
KERN, MK ;
LANG, IM ;
BRASSEUR, JG .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 99 (05) :1269-1274
[5]   PHARYNGEAL DYSFUNCTIONS AND THEIR INTERRELATIONSHIP IN PATIENTS WITH DYSPHAGIA [J].
EKBERG, O ;
WAHLGREN, L .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1985, 26 (06) :659-664
[6]  
Lindgren S, 1991, Dysphagia, V6, P187
[7]   Pharyngeal swallowing disorders - Selection for and outcome after myotomy [J].
Mason, RJ ;
Bremner, CG ;
DeMeester, TR ;
Crookes, PF ;
Peters, JH ;
Hagen, JA ;
DeMeester, SR .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) :598-607
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF BOLUS FLOW ON VERTICAL PHARYNGEAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN THE PHARYNGOESOPHAGEAL SEGMENT - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE [J].
MCCONNEL, FMS ;
GUFFIN, TN ;
CERENKO, D ;
KO, ASF .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1992, 106 (02) :169-174
[9]   SOLID-STATE COMPUTERIZED MANOMETRY IMPROVES DIAGNOSTIC YIELD IN PHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA - SIMULTANEOUS VIDEORADIOGRAPHY AND MANOMETRY IN DYSPHAGIA PATIENTS WITH NORMAL BARIUM SWALLOWS [J].
OLSSON, R ;
CASTELL, JA ;
CASTELL, DO ;
EKBERG, O .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1995, 20 (03) :230-235
[10]   VIDEOMANOMETRY OF THE PHARYNX IN DYSPHAGIC PATIENTS WITH A POSTERIOR CRICOPHARYNGEAL INDENTATION [J].
OLSSON, R ;
EKBERG, O .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (07) :597-601