Impact of Homocysteine-Lowering Vitamin Therapy on Long-Term Outcome of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Elevated homocysteine levels are associated with increased risk for mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the benefit of homocysteine-lowering therapy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of homocysteine-lowering therapy on the long-term outcomes of patients with CAD and its interaction with the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype. The study sample included 492 patients with early-onset CAD who were genotyped for the C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene or screened for elevated homocysteine from January 1997 to December 2002. Folic acid >= 400 mu g/day with or without additional B vitamins was administered at the attending physicians' discretion. There was no difference between treated (n = 1.40) and untreated patients in age, gender, or prevalence of coronary risk factors. Forty-six patients (9%) died during a median follow-up period of 115 months. Treatment was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality in patients with homocysteine levels >15 mu mol/L (4% vs 32%, p <0.001) but not in patients with lower levels (5% vs 7%, p >0.05). On Cox regression analysis, the following factors were independently associated with all-cause mortality: vitamin therapy (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.98, p = 0.046), elevated homocysteine level (hazard ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 9.43, p = 0.013), and older age (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.14, p <0.0001 for an increment of 5 years). The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype was not associated with outcomes. In conclusion, long-term folate-based vitamin therapy was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality in patients with CAD and elevated homocysteine levels. This association was not observed in patients with lower homocysteine levels. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2009;104:745-749)