Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker

被引:2183
作者
Heagerty, PJ [1 ]
Lumley, T
Pepe, MS
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
关键词
accuracy; discrimination; Kaplan-Meier estimator; kernel smoothing; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00337.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
ROC curves are a popular method for displaying sensitivity and specificity of a continuous diagnostic marker, X, for a binary disease variable, D. However, many disease outcomes are time dependent, D(t), and ROC curves that vary as a function of time may be more appropriate. A common example of a time-dependent variable is vital status, where D(t) = 1 if a patient has died prior to time t and zero otherwise. We propose summarizing the discrimination potential of a marker X, measured at baseline (t = 0), by calculating ROC curves for cumulative disease or death incidence by time t, which we denote as ROC(t). A typical complexity with survival data is that observations may be censored. Two ROC curve estimators are proposed that can accommodate censored data. A simple estimator is based on using the Kaplan-Meier estimator for each possible subset X > c. However, this estimator does not guarantee the necessary condition that sensitivity and specificity are monotone in X. An alternative estimator that does guarantee monotonicity is based on a nearest neighbor estimator for the bivariate distribution function of (X, T), where T represents survival time (Akritas, M. J., 1994, Annals of Statistics 22, 1299-1327). We present an example where ROC(t) is used to compare a standard and a modified flow cytometry measurement for predicting survival after detection of breast cancer and an example where the ROC(t) curve displays the impact of modifying eligibility criteria for sample size and power in HIV prevention trials.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 344
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   NEAREST-NEIGHBOR ESTIMATION OF A BIVARIATE DISTRIBUTION UNDER RANDOM CENSORING [J].
AKRITAS, MG .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1994, 22 (03) :1299-1327
[2]   ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICINE IN THE 1980S [J].
BEGG, CB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (12) :1887-1895
[3]   BIASES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
BEGG, CB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) :411-423
[4]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[5]  
Efron B, 1967, Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, V4, P831
[6]  
Fleming T.R., 1991, COUNTING PROCESSES S, DOI 10.1002/9781118150672
[7]  
HANLEY JA, 1989, CRIT REV DIAGN IMAG, V29, P307
[8]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[9]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[10]   Readiness of high-risk populations in the HIV Network for Prevention Trials to participate in HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the United States [J].
Koblin, BA ;
Heagerty, P ;
Sheon, A ;
Buchbinder, S ;
Celum, C ;
Douglas, JM ;
Gross, M ;
Marmor, M ;
Mayer, K ;
Metzger, D ;
Seage, G .
AIDS, 1998, 12 (07) :785-793