Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding

被引:346
作者
Chang, Chia-en A.
Chen, Wei
Gilson, Michael K.
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Inst Biotechnol, Ctr Adv Res Biotechnol, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Chem & Biochem, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Theoret Biol Phys, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
drug design; translation; rotamer; affinity; rotation;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0610494104
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The restriction of a small molecule's motion on binding to a protein causes a loss of configurational entropy, and thus a penalty in binding affinity. Some energy models used in computer-aided ligand design neglect this entropic penalty, whereas others account for it based on an expected drop in the number of accessible rotamers upon binding. However, the validity of the physical assumptions underlying the various approaches is largely unexamined. The present study addresses this issue by using Mining Minima calculations to analyze the association of amprenavir with HIV protease. The computed loss in ligand configurational entropy is large, contributing similar to 25 kcal/mol (4.184 kJ/kcal) to Delta G degrees. Most of this loss results from narrower energy wells in the bound state, rather than a drop in the number of accessible rotamers. Coupling among rotation/translation and internal degrees of freedom complicates the decomposition of the entropy change into additive terms. The results highlight the potential to gain affinity by designing conformationally restricted ligands and have implications for the formulation of energy models for ligand scoring.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1539
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[2]   PROTEIN DATA BANK - COMPUTER-BASED ARCHIVAL FILE FOR MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES [J].
BERNSTEIN, FC ;
KOETZLE, TF ;
WILLIAMS, GJB ;
MEYER, EF ;
BRICE, MD ;
RODGERS, JR ;
KENNARD, O ;
SHIMANOUCHI, T ;
TASUMI, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1977, 112 (03) :535-542
[4]   Absolute binding free energies: A quantitative approach for their calculation [J].
Boresch, S ;
Tettinger, F ;
Leitgeb, M ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2003, 107 (35) :9535-9551
[5]   DECOMPOSITION OF INTERACTION FREE-ENERGIES IN PROTEINS AND OTHER COMPLEX-SYSTEMS [J].
BRADY, GP ;
SHARP, KA .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 254 (01) :77-85
[6]   CHARMM - A PROGRAM FOR MACROMOLECULAR ENERGY, MINIMIZATION, AND DYNAMICS CALCULATIONS [J].
BROOKS, BR ;
BRUCCOLERI, RE ;
OLAFSON, BD ;
STATES, DJ ;
SWAMINATHAN, S ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 4 (02) :187-217
[7]   Evaluating the accuracy of the quasiharmonic approximation [J].
Chang, CE ;
Chen, W ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 1 (05) :1017-1028
[8]   Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: Calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm [J].
Chang, CE ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 126 (40) :13156-13164
[9]   Tork: Conformational analysis method for molecules and complexes [J].
Chang, CE ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 24 (16) :1987-1998
[10]   Calculation of molecular configuration integrals [J].
Chang, CE ;
Potter, MJ ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2003, 107 (04) :1048-1055