Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes

被引:281
作者
Ishii, Joy [1 ]
Xuan, Yuhai [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Grad Sch Business, Knight Management Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163 USA
关键词
Mergers; Acquisitions; Social ties; Social connections; CORPORATE PERFORMANCE; BOARD CONNECTIONS; TAKEOVER BIDS; COMPANY STOCK; ACQUISITIONS; MARKET; GAINS; CEOS; ALLOCATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This article investigates the effect of social ties between acquirers and targets on merger performance. We find that the extent of cross-firm social connection between directors and senior executives at the acquiring and the target firms has a significantly' negative effect on the abnormal returns to the acquirer and to the combined entity upon merger announcement. Moreover, acquirer-target social ties significantly increase the likelihood that the target firm's chief executive officer (CEO) and a larger fraction of the target firm's pre-acquisition board of directors remain on the board of the combined firm after the merger. In addition, we find that acquirer CEOs are more likely to receive bonuses and are more richly compensated for completing mergers with targets that are highly connected to the acquiring firms, that acquisitions are more likely to take place between two firms that are well connected to each other through social ties, and that such acquisitions are more likely to subsequently be divested for performance-related reasons. Taken together, our results suggest that social ties between the acquirer and the target lead to poorer decision making and lower value creation for shareholders overall. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 363
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Ahern K., 2014, J FINANCE
[2]   New evidence and perspectives on mergers [J].
Andrade, G ;
Mitchell, M ;
Stafford, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (02) :103-120
[3]  
Asch SE., 1951, Groups, leadership and men, P177
[4]  
Bargeron L., 2009, DO TARGET CEOS UNPUB
[5]  
Barnea A., 2006, MOM ALL THE OTHER KI
[6]   Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock [J].
Benartzi, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (05) :1747-1764
[7]   Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Schoar, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) :1169-1208
[8]   SYNERGISTIC GAINS FROM CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS AND THEIR DIVISION BETWEEN THE STOCKHOLDERS OF TARGET AND ACQUIRING FIRMS [J].
BRADLEY, M ;
DESAI, A ;
KIM, EH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 21 (01) :3-40
[9]   Neighbors matter: Causal community effects and stock market participation [J].
Brown, Jeffrey R. ;
Ivkovic, Zoran ;
Smith, Paul A. ;
Weisbenner, Scott .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (03) :1509-1531
[10]   USING DAILY STOCK RETURNS - THE CASE OF EVENT STUDIES [J].
BROWN, SJ ;
WARNER, JB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 14 (01) :3-31