Do firms in clusters invest in R&D more intensively? Theory and evidence from multi-country data

被引:57
作者
Lee, Chang-Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Seoul 130722, South Korea
关键词
R&D intensity; Cluster; Geographical proximity; Localized knowledge spillovers; Natural excludability; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE; INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS; LOCATION MATTER; TECHNOLOGY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; AGGLOMERATION; INNOVATION; COLLABORATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2009.04.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate whether firms located in clusters invest more intensively in research and development (R&D) than their non-clustered counterparts. Specifically, it proposes a model of firm R&D and tests empirically its implications for the effect of being located in a cluster on firm R&D intensity. The key ideas underlying the theory are as follows: (I) due either to natural excludability or to a high degree of stickiness of R&D-opportunity-bearing technological knowledge, geographical proximity per se is limited in the (automatic) spillover of knowledge with promising R&D opportunities to nearby firms: (2) geographical proximity may, however, help enhance the effectiveness or efficiency of knowledge exchange through market mechanisms (e.g., through contract R&D, R&D collaboration); (3) potential advantages (or disadvantages) in firm R&D of being located in a cluster also depend on the degree of asymmetry in technological competence among firms located in the cluster. The key ideas are supported by an empirical analysis of a multi-industry, multi-country data set compiled by the World Bank. In particular, the results show that being located in a cluster per se actually has a negative effect on firm R&D intensity, which is in contrast to the conventional wisdom of pure or automatic localized knowledge spillovers, as far as firm R&D intensity is concerned. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1171
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS AND RECIPIENT FIRM SIZE [J].
ACS, ZJ ;
AUDRETSCH, DB ;
FELDMAN, MP .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1994, 76 (02) :336-340
[2]   Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data [J].
Adams, JD ;
Jaffe, AB .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 27 (04) :700-721
[3]   Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks [J].
Almeida, P ;
Kogut, B .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (07) :905-917
[4]   MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE - THE US PERSONAL-COMPUTER INDUSTRY [J].
ANGEL, DP ;
ENGSTROM, J .
ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 1995, 71 (01) :79-102
[5]   Inter-firm collaboration and technology development partnerships within US manufacturing industries [J].
Angel, DP .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2002, 36 (04) :333-344
[6]  
[Anonymous], 909 U CAL BERK CTR R
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econ. Innov. New Technol., DOI [10.1080/10438590100000010, DOI 10.1080/10438590100000010]
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, BOOSTING INNOVATION
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, WORKSH CLUST HIGH TE
[10]   Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations [J].
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A ;
Acs, Z .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1997, 42 (03) :422-448