Subsidy competition and the mode of FDI

被引:13
作者
Albornoz, Facundo [1 ]
Corcos, Gregory [2 ]
Kendall, Toby [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Econ, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Norwegian Sch Econ & Business Adm, Dept Econ, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Subsidy competition; FDI; Greenfield investment; Mergers and acquisitions; Regional integration; Positive externalities; CROSS-BORDER MERGERS; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ECONOMIC-INTEGRATION; PROFITABILITY; WELFARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.02.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We model subsidy competition for a foreign MNC's investment in two trading partners. Taking into account acquisitions as an alternative investment mode weakens the case for subsidising greenfield investment. Competition between countries results in welfare losses. which are reinforced by positive externalities from the MNC's presence and regional integration. The results also apply to situations where the acquisition price accounts for the possibility of subsidies and when governments use acquisition subsidies as an alternative to greenfield subsidies. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 501
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[2]  
[Anonymous], 9489 NBER
[3]  
ARNOLD J, 2007, 3193 WORLD BANK
[4]  
Barros PedroP., 2000, Review of International Economics, V8, P360, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9396.00227
[6]   Economic integration and the profitability of cross-border mergers and acquisitions [J].
Bjorvatn, K .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 48 (06) :1211-1226
[7]   Policy competition for foreign direct investment between asymmetric countries [J].
Bjorvatn, Kjetil ;
Eckel, Carsten .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 50 (07) :1891-1907
[8]  
BLYDE J, 2004, EXPORTING OUTSOURCIN
[9]  
Calderon C., 2002, Greenfield FDI vs. Mergers and Acquisitions: Does the Distinction Matter?
[10]  
CHARLTON A, 2003, 203 OECD DEV CT