Make-to-order, make-to-stock, or delay product differentiation? A common framework for modeling and analysis

被引:126
作者
Gupta, D [1 ]
Benjaafar, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Mech Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/07408170490438519
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Delaying product differentiation is a hybrid strategy that strives to reconcile the dual needs of high variety and quick response time. A common product platform is built to stock in the first stage of production (called the Make-To-Stock (NITS) stage) which is then differentiated into different products after demand is known in the second stage (known as the Make-To-Order (MTO) stage). In this article, we develop models to compute the costs and benefits of delaying differentiation in series production systems when the order lead times are load dependent. The models are then used to gain insights through analytical and numerical comparisons. For example, we observe the following patterns in a large number of numerical experiments. The effect of congestion in the NITS and MTO stages is asymmetric with tighter capacity at the MTO stage having a greater detrimental effect on the desirability of delaying differentiation. If there is flexibility in choosing the point of differentiation, higher loading is observed to favor later differentiation. Also, if the sequence in which work is performed can be affected, then placing workstations that have a tighter capacity in the NITS stage lowers costs.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 546
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Design for postponement: A comprehensive characterization of its benefits under unknown demand distributions [J].
Aviv, Y ;
Federgruen, A .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (04) :578-598
[2]   Capacitated multi-item inventory systems with random and seasonally fluctuating demands: Implications for postponement strategies [J].
Aviv, Y ;
Federgruen, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (04) :512-531
[3]  
AVIV Y, 1999, QUANTITATIVE MODELS, P553
[4]  
Bruce L., 1987, INT MANAG, V42, P24
[5]  
Buzacott J.A., 1993, STOCHASTIC MODELS MA
[6]  
BUZACOTT JA, 1992, NEW DIRECTIONS OPERA, P445
[7]   A result on networks of queues with customer coalescence and state-dependent signaling [J].
Chao, XL ;
Zheng, SH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1998, 35 (01) :151-164
[8]   Dynamic scheduling in a make-to-stock system: A partial characterization of optimal policies [J].
De Vericourt, F ;
Karaesmen, F ;
Dallery, Y .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 48 (05) :811-819
[9]   EFFECTS OF CENTRALIZATION ON EXPECTED COSTS IN A MULTI-LOCATION NEWSBOY PROBLEM [J].
EPPEN, GD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 25 (05) :498-501
[10]  
Feitzinger E, 1997, HARVARD BUS REV, V75, P116