RESOURCE ALLOCATION STRATEGY FOR INNOVATION PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

被引:264
作者
Klingebiel, Ronald [1 ]
Rammer, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Ctr European Econ Res, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
strategic management of innovation; resource allocation; flexibility; innovation portfolios; new product development process; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; REAL OPTIONS; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; DECISION-MAKING; UNCERTAINTY; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; MODELS; COEFFICIENTS;
D O I
10.1002/smj.2107
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Our study demonstrates empirically that the choice of resource allocation strategy affects innovation performance. Allocating resources to a broader range of innovation projects increases new product sales, an effect that appears to outweigh that of resource intensity. In addition, we find that the performance benefit of breadth is higher for firms that allocate resources selectively at later stages of the innovation process. This breadth-selectiveness effect is greatest for firms intending to create relatively more novel products, departing further from their knowledge base. Based on these results, we theorize that breadth increases performance because it spreads firms' bets on unproven innovative endeavors. Limiting resource commitments by selecting out deteriorating projects prevents an escalation in the costs of breadth. This advantage increases with the uncertainty implicit in greater innovative intent. The paper thus contributes to theory of how resource allocation strategies influence performance outcomes of innovation project portfolios. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 268
页数:23
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   REAL OPTIONS AND RESOURCE REALLOCATION PROCESSES [J].
Adner, Ron .
REAL OPTIONS THEORY, 2007, 24 :363-372
[2]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, OSL MAN PROP GUID CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10438590210899, 10.1080/10438590210899]
[5]   AN INTRODUCTION TO SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS IN SOCIOLOGICAL DATA [J].
BERK, RA .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1983, 48 (03) :386-398
[6]   Determining the appropriate depth and breadth of a firm's product portfolio [J].
Bordley, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2003, 40 (01) :39-53
[7]   Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis [J].
Boudreau, Kevin J. ;
Lacetera, Nicola ;
Lakhani, Karim R. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (05) :843-863
[8]   The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J].
Brown, SL ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-34
[9]   PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
BROWN, SL ;
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (02) :343-378
[10]   DOMINANCE ANALYSIS - A NEW APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PREDICTORS IN MULTIPLE-REGRESSION [J].
BUDESCU, DV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 114 (03) :542-551