Protected values

被引:462
作者
Baron, J [1 ]
Spranca, M [1 ]
机构
[1] RAND CORP,SANTA MONICA,CA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1997.2690
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Protected values are those that resist trade-offs with other values, particularly economic values. We propose that such values arise from deontological rules concerning action. People are concerned about their participation in transactions rather than just with the consequences that result. This proposal implies that protected values, defined as those that display trade-off resistance, will also tend to display quantity insensitivity, agent relativity, and moral obligation. People will also tend to experience anger at the thought of making trade-offs, and to engage in denial of the need for trade-offs through wishful thinking. These five properties were correlated with tradeoff resistance (across different values, within subjects) in five studies in which subjects answered several questions about each of several values, or in which they indicated their willingness to pay to prevent some harmful action. These correlations were found even when the subjects could not tell the experimenters which values they were responding to, so they cannot be ascribed entirely to subjects' desire to express commitment. We discuss implications for value measurement and public policy. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   DESIGNING BABIES - MORALLY PERMISSIBLE WAYS TO MODIFY THE HUMAN GENOME [J].
AGAR, N .
BIOETHICS, 1995, 9 (01) :1-15
[2]  
Anderson Elizabeth., 1993, VALUE ETHICS EC
[3]   BLOCKED EXCHANGES - A TAXONOMY [J].
ANDRE, J .
ETHICS, 1992, 103 (01) :29-47
[4]   IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC-GOODS - A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING [J].
ANDREONI, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 100 (401) :464-477
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, VIEW NOWHERE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1981, MORAL THINKING
[8]   REFERENCE POINTS AND OMISSION BIAS [J].
BARON, J ;
RITOV, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 59 (03) :475-498
[10]  
Baron J, 1996, CODES OF CONDUCT, P197