Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education?

被引:79
作者
Eigenmann, C. A. [1 ]
Colagiuri, R. [1 ]
Skinner, T. C. [2 ]
Trevena, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Diabet Unit, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Combined Univ Ctr Rural Hlth, Geraldton, WA, Australia
关键词
diabetes education; indicators; measurement tools; outcomes; PROBLEM AREAS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; SCALE; DISTRESS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02697.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To critically appraise the suitability, validity, reliability, feasibility and sensitivity to change of available psychometric tools for measuring the education outcomes identified in the (Australian) National Consensus on Outcomes and Indicators for Diabetes Patient Education. Potentially suitable psychometric measurement tools were identified through a two-step process. Step 1: a structured semi-systematic literature review and consultation with experts; step 2: development of inclusion criteria and a formal, purpose-designed, systematically derived Appraisal Checklist-from the literature and with expert psychometric advice-to critically appraise the identified tools for relevance, validity, reliability, responsiveness to change, burden, feasibility and acceptability. Searching medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and cinhal yielded 37 diabetes-specific and generic measurement tools. Eleven of these did not address the research questions, leaving 26 tools. Of these, 11 assessed indicators of psychological adjustment; seven assessed various domains of self-determination; five measured self-management behaviours, for example, foot care, blood glucose testing and lifestyle domains; and three measured diabetes knowledge und understanding, respectively. When the Appraisal Checklist was applied, only three tools met all criteria, namely the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale, the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) scale and the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS). However, a number of other suitable tools [i.e. the Diabetes Integration Scale (ATT19), the Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-1/18), the Self-Care Inventory-Revised (SCI-R), the Diabetes Management Self Efficacy Scale Australian/English version (DMSES-A/E), the Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form (DES-SF)] met all except one criteria, that is, either no formal test-retest or no responsiveness to change data. Although numerous tools were identified, few met rigorous psychometric appraisal criteria. Issues of suitability, adequate psychometric testing for the intended purpose, burden and feasibility need to be considered before adopting tools for measuring diabetes education outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 436
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Patient-provider communication and self-care behavior among type 2 diabetes patients [J].
Aikens, JE ;
Bingham, R ;
Piette, JD .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2005, 31 (05) :681-690
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB PSYCHOL DIABETES
[4]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE APPRAISAL OF DIABETES SCALE [J].
CAREY, MP ;
JORGENSEN, RS ;
WEINSTOCK, RS ;
SPRAFKIN, RP ;
LANTINGA, LJ ;
CARNRIKE, CLM ;
BAKER, MT ;
MEISLER, AW .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1991, 14 (01) :43-51
[5]  
Colagiuri R., 2004, INFORM ED PEOPLE DIA
[6]   Structured patient education: the Diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference [J].
Deakin, T. A. ;
Cade, J. E. ;
Williams, R. ;
Greenwood, D. C. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (09) :944-954
[7]  
Eigenmann C., 2007, Outcomes and indicators for diabetes education: a national consensus position
[8]   Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes - Not just a question of semantics [J].
Fisher, Lawrence ;
Skaff, Marilyn M. ;
Mullan, Joseph T. ;
Arean, Patricia ;
Mohr, David ;
Masharani, Umesh ;
Glasgow, Russell ;
Laurencin, Grace .
DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 (03) :542-548
[9]  
Fitzpatrick R, 1998, Health Technol Assess, V2, pi
[10]   Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review [J].
Garratt, AM ;
Schmidt, L ;
Fitzpatrick, R .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2002, 19 (01) :1-11