Is energy cost an accurate indicator of natural resource quality?

被引:19
作者
Stern, DI [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Studies, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
resource quality; energy cost; energy analysis; scarcity; indicators;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00060-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The use of energy cost as an indicator of natural resource quality is examined. Energy cost is the direct and indirect energy used to produce a unit of a resource commodity. Different approaches to the role of energy in the economy are discussed and it is demonstrated theoretically that energy cost can give false indications of changes in resource quality. This is because energy cost is only an accurate indicator of resource quality if either energy is the single primary factor of production and the economy can be represented by an input-output model, or if there is substitutability between the factors of production, then marginal products must be proportional to the factors' embodied energy. These conditions are tested empirically using data from the US agricultural sector. The results show that there is substitutability and marginal products are not proportional to embodied energy. However, the strong neoclassical assumption of price-taking profit-maximization can be rejected at a 5% level of significance, though not at the 3.5% level. The generality of the empirical results may be restricted due to data limitations but the theoretical framework can be applied to other data sets, other resources, and even other indicators. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 394
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
BALL VE, 1995, AGR PRODUCTIVITY REV
[2]  
Barnett H.J., 1963, Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability. Published for Resources for the Future
[3]   AGGREGATE ENERGY, EFFICIENCY, AND PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT [J].
BERNDT, ER .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY, 1978, 3 :225-273
[4]  
BERNDT ER, 1975, REV ECON STAT, V57, P259, DOI 10.2307/1923910
[5]  
Berndt Ernst R., 1993, ENERGY J, V14, P33, DOI [DOI 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol14-No1-2, 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol14-no1-2, DOI 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VOL14-NO1-2]
[6]   Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: A comparative view [J].
Brown, MT ;
Herendeen, RA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 19 (03) :219-235
[7]  
Chapman P. F., 1983, Metal resources and energy, DOI 10.1016/C2013-0-04151-5
[8]   SUBSTITUTION OF INFORMATION FOR ENERGY - CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND, REALITIES AND LIMITS [J].
CHEN, X .
ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (01) :15-27
[9]   RESOURCE DEGRADATION, TECHNICAL CHANGE, AND THE PRODUCTIVITY OF ENERGY USE IN US AGRICULTURE [J].
CLEVELAND, CJ .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 13 (03) :185-201
[10]   THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT USE OF FOSSIL-FUELS AND ELECTRICITY IN USA AGRICULTURE, 1910-1990 [J].
CLEVELAND, CJ .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 55 (02) :111-121