The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach

被引:409
作者
Bagley, MN
Mokhtarian, PL
机构
[1] S Texas Community Coll, McAllen, TX 78502 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s001680200083
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using a system of structural equations, this paper empirically examines the relationship of residential neighborhood type to travel behavior, incorporating attitudinal, lifestyle, and demographic variables. Data on these variables were collected from residents of five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area in 1993 (final N = 515), including "traditional" and "suburban" as Well as mixtures of those two extremes. A conceptual model of the interrelationships among the key variables of interest was operationalized with a nine-equation structural model system. The nine endogenous variables included two measures of residential location type, three measures of travel demand, three attitudinal measures, and one measure of job location. In terms of both direct and total effects, attitudinal and lifestyle variables had the greatest impact on travel demand among all the explanatory variables. By contrast, residential location type had little impact On travel behavior. This is perhaps the strongest evidence to date supporting the speculation that the association commonly observed between land use configuration and travel patterns is not one of direct causality, but due primarily to correlations of each of those variables with others. In particular, the results suggest that when attitudinal, lifestyle, and sociodemographic variables are accounted for, neighborhood type has little influence on travel behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 297
页数:19
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Transportation Research Record
[2]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1997, AMOS USERS GUIDE VER
[3]   A methodology for the disaggregate, multidimensional measurement of residential neighbourhood type [J].
Bagley, MN ;
Mokhtarian, PL ;
Kitamura, R .
URBAN STUDIES, 2002, 39 (04) :689-704
[4]  
Bagley MN, 1999, TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY, P735
[5]  
BAGLEY MN, 1999, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[6]   Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions [J].
Bentler, PM ;
Dudgeon, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 47 :563-592
[7]   APPLICATIONS OF COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING IN PSYCHOLOGY - CAUSE FOR CONCERN [J].
BRECKLER, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1990, 107 (02) :260-273
[8]  
Calthorpe P., 1992, CHANGING AM BLUEPRIN, P699
[9]  
Cervero R., 1996, TRANSPORT POLICY, V3, P127, DOI DOI 10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9
[10]  
Everitt B., 1993, CLUSTER ANAL