Supplier Selection Behavior Under Uncertainty: Contextual and Cognitive Effects on Risk Perception and Choice

被引:65
作者
Kull, Thomas J. [1 ]
Oke, Adegoke [1 ]
Dooley, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; PERCEIVED-RISK; STRATEGIC RISK; REAL OPTIONS; MODEL; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; AMBIGUITY; SUPPORT; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1111/deci.12078
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Buyers often make supplier selection decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Although the analytical aspects of supplier selection are well developed, the psychological aspects are less so. This article uses supply chain management and behavioral decision theories to propose that attributes of the purchasing situation (category difficulty, category importance, and contingent pay) affect cognition that, in turn, affects a supply manager's choice. We conducted a supplier selection behavioral experiment with practicing managers to test the model's hypotheses. When the context involves an important or difficult sourcing category, higher risk perceptions exist that increase preference for a supplier with more certain outcomes, even when that choice has a lower expected payoff. However, the presence of contingent pay decreases risk perceptions through higher perceived supplier control. We also find that a manager's risk propensity increases preferences for a supplier with less certain outcomes regardless of perceived risk. Our model and results provide a theoretical framework for further study into the cognitive aspects of supplier selection behavior and provide insight into biases that influence practicing supply chain managers.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 505
页数:39
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Amaral J, 2009, PROD OPER MANAG, V18, P621, DOI [10.3401/poms.1080.01036, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01036.x]
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]   Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure [J].
Anderson, Lisa R. ;
Mellor, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2009, 39 (02) :137-160
[5]   RIGOR IN BEHAVIORAL EXPERIMENTS: A BASIC PRIMER FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT RESEARCHERS [J].
Bachrach, Daniel G. ;
Bendoly, Elliot .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (03) :5-8
[6]   ON THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS IN EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGNS [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
YI, YJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (03) :271-284
[7]  
Baird I.S., 1990, RISK STRATEGY MANAGE, V5, P21
[8]   TOWARD A CONTINGENCY-MODEL OF STRATEGIC RISK-TAKING [J].
BAIRD, IS ;
THOMAS, H .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1985, 10 (02) :230-243
[9]  
Beach L.R., 1978, ACAD MANAGE REV, V3, P439, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1978.4305717
[10]   MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES, MONITORING, AND RISK BEARING - A STUDY OF EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION, OWNERSHIP, AND BOARD STRUCTURE IN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS [J].
BEATTY, RP ;
ZAJAC, EJ .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1994, 39 (02) :313-335